Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Law Development Journal Sultan Agung Notary Law Review
Al Hadid, Andi Pangerang
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of the Strength of a Deed Made by a Notary Against the Concept of Cyber Notary Al Hadid, Andi Pangerang; Nur’aini, Tiya; Christy, Florentina; Tjempaka, Tjempaka
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 6, No 3 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : Program Studi Master of Notary Law (S2), Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.v6i3.42425

Abstract

Technological advances are increasingly developing every year, bringing impacts to all aspects, especially in the field of notary. One of them is the concept of Cyber Notary which uses electronic media in every act, while the field of notary has not regulated this, therefore this condition requires further research. The problem taken in this study is whether the deed remains an authentic deed if using the Cyber Notary concept based on the Notary Law and the Electronic Information and Technology Law and solutions to deal with digital developments for Notaries when making deeds. This study uses descriptive Normative Law Research. The results of this study indicate that according to Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Notary, basically the concept cannot be applied because based on Article 16 paragraph 1 letter m it stipulates that after the deed is read in front of the parties, witnesses and Notary, the deed is signed at that time, therefore in this case it is necessary to have harmonization between the Notary Law and the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions.
Incompatibility of The PPAT Deed Numbering Period with The BPHTB Validation Period at BAPENDA Jakarta Al Hadid, Andi Pangerang; Adhari, Ade
Law Development Journal Vol 6, No 4 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.6.4.600-607

Abstract

Ownership of Rights to a person is proven by ownership of a Land Certificate that can be transferred to another person, one way is by Sale and Purchase between the Land Owner as the seller and the Buyer. In a transfer of such rights there are taxes that must be paid, one of which is the Land and Building Acquisition Tax or abbreviated as BPHTB and after payment, BPHTB Validation will be carried out with a Maximum Period of 30 Working Days based on the Governor's Regulation and requires a PPAT Deed Number for input. Meanwhile, based on Government Regulations, the PPAT Deed Number has a period of 7 working days from the time it is signed and must be registered with the National Land Agency. Therefore, this creates many multi-interpretations because there is no harmony between one regulation and another. The problem taken in this study is how the inconsistency of the PPAT Deed Number Period with BPHTB Validation. The method used is Normative Jurisprudence with Analytical Descriptive Specifications. The research results show that there is a mismatch between the PPAT Deed Number Period and the BPHTB Validation Period, this condition must be addressed by adjusting the Regulation of the Governor of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta Number 34 of 2022 with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 which based on the Hierarchy of Legislation is a higher regulation than the Governor's Regulation.
Co-Authors Ade Adhari Christy, Florentina Nur’aini, Tiya Tjempaka, Tjempaka