Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

A Comparative Analysis of Speech Errors in U.S. 2024 Presidential Debate Kaonedy, Jesselyn; Nasution, Diantry Binarwaty Habibie; Istiqomah, Istiqomah; Sastia, May; Rangkuti, Rahmadsyah
Journal of English Language and Education Vol 9, No 6 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jele.v9i6.568

Abstract

This study focused on reviewing and analyzing the types of speech errors, comparing the frequency of such errors, and examining the reasons behind speech errors, as made by former President of the United States Donald Trump (DT) and Vice President Kamala Harris (KH) in the 2024 presidential election debate. Theory of speech error by Clark and Clark (1977) is used as the main guidance in the analysis. The debate, entitled "Harris vs Trump in the ABC News 2024 Presidential Debate", lasted 90 minutes. This study used a qualitative approach, this study analyzed the video of DT and KH, examining words, phrases, and sentences by transcribing their speeches. The results showed that DT committed more speech errors in total but less in types, while KH committed more types of speech errors and less errors in total. The causes of these speech errors were due to social factors, including anxiety and social pressure during the debate. Based on the amount of speech errors, KH sounds more promising than DT and has bigger possibilities to attract votes in the upcoming election.
Romanticization or Reality: It Ends with Us by Colleen Hoover Through Corpus Stylistics Perspective Kaonedy, Jesselyn; Istiqomah; Sastia, May; Nasution, Diantry Binarwaty Habibie; Rangkuti, Rahmadsyah
ELTALL: English Language Teaching, Applied Linguistic and Literature Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/eltall.v6i1.10769

Abstract

Corpus stylistics, which involves the analysis of electronic archives of written material, facilitates the understanding of connections between words. This research aims to provide linguistic evidence regarding the genre of Colleen Hoover's popular fiction, It Ends with Us, specifically, to ascertain whether it is a pure romance novel or incorporates aspects of literary realism. A descriptive qualitative approach, grounded in Mahlberg's (2013) corpus stylistics theory, is employed. The primary data for analysis are the four most frequently occurring verbs identified using AntConc. The collocations associated with each verb are subsequently categorized into "attempts to romanticize" or "narrations of reality" to determine the prevailing stylistic strategy. The research demonstrates that the novel utilizes a greater proportion of "realistic" words compared to "romantic" words, thereby indicating its alignment with literary realism. The narrative modifications are intended to heighten the story's engagement, rather than to romanticize domestic abuse or toxic relationships.
Discourse Analysis of Thematic Structure: SEVENTEEN JOSHUA’s Speech in UNESCO Youth Forum Kaonedy, Jesselyn; Nasution, Diantry Binarwaty Habibie; Istiqomah , Istiqomah; Sastia, May; Zein, T. Thyrhaya
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v14i1.64352

Abstract

This study aimed to find the underlying messages in SEVENTEEN Joshua’s Speech in UNESCO Youth Forum through a textual metafunction analysis on the thematic structure. SEVENTEEN, a global K-Pop boy band, was chosen to deliver a speech as the representation of youth in UNESCO Youth Forum in Paris last 2023. This research used a descriptive-qualitative method, Halliday’s textual metafunction and Leech’s thematic meaning theories. Based on the findings, JOSHUA, the American member of SEVENTEEN, used a lot of unmarked themes in highlighting the group’s effort and dedication in promoting education. Meanwhile, most of the marked themes were used to highlight their long-lasting and consistent contribution to UNESCO. Therefore, this research concluded that JOSHUA made SEVENTEEN as the ‘main character’ in his speech.
The Language of Shame in Cyber Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Gendered Moral Policing on X Media Istiqomah, Istiqomah; Sastia, May; Salsabila, Elfa; Rangkuti, Rahmadsyah
Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/titian.v9i2.48850

Abstract

Cyber Discourse Analysis (CDA), which analyzes how language constructs and maintains power relations in online communication, enables us to study gendered moral policing on the internet. This research aims to provide linguistic evidence of how moral judgment and gender discrimination are realized in public reaction to Erika Carlina's pregnancy scandal on the social media site X. A qualitative descriptive approach, theorized by Fairclough's (1995) three-dimensional CDA model and supported by Van Dijk's (2015) discourse theory and Cameron's (2012) verbal hygiene theory, is employed. The research demonstrates that male respondents employ rational and evaluative language with a consideration of responsibility and social norms, while female respondents use emotional and corrective language that demonstrates internalized patriarchal ideology. The findings show that online discussion is an electronic extension of classical moral control, whereby the discourse of shame is employed as a communal tool of gendered judgment and social control in Indonesian society. Abstrak Analisis Wacana Siber (Cyber Discourse Analysis/CDA), yang menelaah bagaimana bahasa membangun dan mempertahankan relasi kuasa dalam komunikasi daring, memungkinkan penelitian terhadap praktik gendered moral policing atau pengawasan moral berbasis gender di internet. Penelitian ini bertujuan memberikan bukti linguistik mengenai bagaimana penilaian moral dan diskriminasi gender direalisasikan dalam reaksi publik terhadap skandal kehamilan Erika Carlina di media sosial X. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif, dengan kerangka teori Analisis Wacana Kritis tiga dimensi dari Fairclough (1995), serta didukung oleh teori wacana Van Dijk (2015) dan teori verbal hygiene dari Cameron (2012). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa responden laki-laki cenderung menggunakan bahasa yang rasional dan evaluatif dengan mempertimbangkan tanggung jawab serta norma sosial, sedangkan responden perempuan menampilkan bahasa yang emosional dan korektif yang merepresentasikan internalisasi ideologi patriarki. Temuan ini mengungkap bahwa diskusi daring merupakan perpanjangan elektronik dari praktik kontrol moral klasik, di mana wacana malu digunakan sebagai alat komunal untuk menghakimi dan mengontrol perilaku berbasis gender dalam masyarakat Indonesia