Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cita Hukum Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran
Terletskii, Anatoliy
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Penuntutan: Perbandingan Hukum dari Amerika Serikat dan Negara-negara Eropa Orzhynska, Elvira; Rarytska, Viktoria; Stoianov, Konstiantyn; Dontsov, Denys; Terletskii, Anatoliy
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 24 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v24i2.14472

Abstract

This research used a qualitative approach with a focus on comparative studies and document analysis. The approach was designed to explore the legal regulations and organizational systems of prosecutors' offices in the United States, European countries, and Ukraine. Data were collected through a literature review of relevant constitutions, laws, and other official documents, such as reports from international organizations, court decisions, and prosecutorial codes of ethics. The analysis was conducted using a comparative method, whereby prosecutorial systems from different countries were compared based on several key criteria. These criteria included organizational structure, level of independence, legal authority, and efficiency of human resources and funding. This approach enabled the identification of best practices that could be applied to address local challenges in Ukraine. Data were analyzed thematically to identify patterns, differences, and similarities among the prosecutorial systems studied. For example, decentralized systems in the United States were compared with centralized models in Germany and France to assess their implications for case management effectiveness. The analysis also included an evaluation of the prosecutor's ability to handle specialized cases, such as war crimes investigations, as well as integration with applicable international standards. As a final step, the research validated the findings through source triangulation to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the data. This approach provided a solid basis for developing recommendations for reforming the prosecutorial system in Ukraine oriented towards the principles of the rule of law, protection of human rights, and operational effectiveness.
Decentralization of Public Authorities in Ukraine: Theoretical-Legal and Administrative Aspects Terletskii, Anatoliy; Andreiev, Dmytro; Kachan, Vasyl; Leshchenko, Oleksandr; Mashchenko, Olha
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 12, No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i3.43696

Abstract

The research aims to reveal the administrative-legal, environmental, social and customs principles of decentralising public authority in Ukraine. Main content. The article reveals the main definitions of decentralisation of power and analyses the advantages and disadvantages of decentralisation in the public administration system. The article also presents the basic typology of decentralising power in foreign countries. It characterises these types, as well as an attempt to summarise the reasons for performing decentralisation in Ukraine.  Methodology:  The use of systemic, functional, and structural methods in this study made it possible to define concepts and types, as well as to establish the reasons for the introduction of the decentralisation reform in Ukraine. Conclusions. Various approaches to reform in European countries and their results have been considered due to the need to implement decentralisation in Ukraine. The result of the work consists of determining the main definitions of the decentralisation of power, analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the decentralisation process, definition of the main types of decentralisation, and generalisation of the main reasons for introducing decentralisation in Ukraine.
Decentralization of Public Authorities in Ukraine: Theoretical-Legal and Administrative Aspects Terletskii, Anatoliy; Andreiev, Dmytro; Kachan, Vasyl; Leshchenko, Oleksandr; Mashchenko, Olha
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i3.43696

Abstract

The research aims to reveal the administrative-legal, environmental, social and customs principles of decentralising public authority in Ukraine. Main content. The article reveals the main definitions of decentralisation of power and analyses the advantages and disadvantages of decentralisation in the public administration system. The article also presents the basic typology of decentralising power in foreign countries. It characterises these types, as well as an attempt to summarise the reasons for performing decentralisation in Ukraine.  Methodology:  The use of systemic, functional, and structural methods in this study made it possible to define concepts and types, as well as to establish the reasons for the introduction of the decentralisation reform in Ukraine. Conclusions. Various approaches to reform in European countries and their results have been considered due to the need to implement decentralisation in Ukraine. The result of the work consists of determining the main definitions of the decentralisation of power, analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the decentralisation process, definition of the main types of decentralisation, and generalisation of the main reasons for introducing decentralisation in Ukraine.
Co-Authors Andreiev, Dmytro Dontsov, Denys Kachan, Vasyl Leshchenko, Oleksandr Mashchenko, Olha Orzhynska, Elvira Rarytska, Viktoria Stoianov, Konstiantyn