Nugroho, Agustinus Hadi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Religious Fanatic Subjects in the Postmodernism Era: the Meta-Theory of the Sociology of Religion Peter L. Berger Nugroho, Agustinus Hadi; Diputra, Tito Briyan
BELIEF: Sociology of Religion Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): BELIEF: Sociology of Religion
Publisher : UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/belief.v1i1.6469

Abstract

The tendency of every adherent of a religion or a sect of belief, it acknowledged or not, is fanaticism. It seems that there is not a single believer who will say that his religion is worse than any other religion. Every adherent of a religion will tend to defend their respective religions. Even if there is a difference, it only lies in the level of moderation; one is more open, while the other is more closed. In the book The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, Berger seeks to understand how religious belief is shaped at the individual and social levels. Furthermore, he wants to say, of course, latently, that religion is like a shell or canopy, which makes its adherents feel safe but at the same time, it is difficult to see other values that exist outside the spectrum of values of the truth of their religion. The nature of the religious belief system creates perspective restrictions and ideological tendencies. Berger's thoughts on the sociology of religion are still relevant today, especially in the context of a pluralistic Indonesian society in the context of caring for diversity. This research method is qualitative, with literacy study techniques that refer to Berger's works, as well as through literacy studies of other relevant writings. The results of this research are expected to enrich theoretical studies for sociology scholars, especially those interested in the sociology of religion.
Menginisiasi Kerja Sama Riset Internasional yang Setara, Adil, dan Bermanfaat bagi Indonesia Nugroho, Agustinus Hadi
Journal of Politics and Democracy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Politics and Democracy (September)
Publisher : Indonesian Democracy Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61183/polikrasi.v1i1.5

Abstract

Kerjasama riset internasional dapat dipahami sebagai proses sosial pada bidang riset karena didalamnya terdapat simpul dialektis antara kepentingan Indonesia dan kepentingan pihak asing. Sebagai proses sosial maka kerjasama riset internasional seharusnya dapat dipahami lewat kerangka teoritis materialisme-dialektis. Sesuai dengan kerangka teoritis ini maka perlu dibedakan antara aspek infrastruktur (basis) dan aspek suprastruktur. Aspek infrastruktur pada kerjasama riset internasional adalah dimensi finansial, sementara aspek suprastrukturnya adalah dimensi institusional dan dimensi pengetahuan. Untuk mengoptimalkan manfaat dari kerjasama riset internasional tidak hanya ditempuh dengan mengusulkan langkah-langkah kebijakan yang bersifat praktis, melainkan terdapat keperluan untuk memahami pra-kondisi yang melatarbelakangi ekosistem dari kerjasama riset internasional. Pra-kondisi tersebut terutama menyangkut isu-isu ketidaksetaraan yang secara latent seringkali tidak disadari pada relasi yang tercipta antara mitra lokal dan mitra asingnya. Dengan memahami pra-kondisi ketidaksetaraan tersebut, diharapkan dapat membantu pemerintah untuk merumuskan strategi-strategi kebijakan yang berpegang pada prinsip-prinsip keadilan demi mendorong kerjasama riset internasional yang semakin memberi manfaat secara optimal bagi kepentingan Indonesia.