Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Politics and Democracy BELIEF: Sociology of Religion Journal
Nugroho, Agustinus Hadi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Religious Fanatic Subjects in the Postmodernism Era: the Meta-Theory of the Sociology of Religion Peter L. Berger Nugroho, Agustinus Hadi; Diputra, Tito Briyan
BELIEF: Sociology of Religion Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): BELIEF: Sociology of Religion
Publisher : UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/belief.v1i1.6469

Abstract

The tendency of every adherent of a religion or a sect of belief, it acknowledged or not, is fanaticism. It seems that there is not a single believer who will say that his religion is worse than any other religion. Every adherent of a religion will tend to defend their respective religions. Even if there is a difference, it only lies in the level of moderation; one is more open, while the other is more closed. In the book The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, Berger seeks to understand how religious belief is shaped at the individual and social levels. Furthermore, he wants to say, of course, latently, that religion is like a shell or canopy, which makes its adherents feel safe but at the same time, it is difficult to see other values that exist outside the spectrum of values of the truth of their religion. The nature of the religious belief system creates perspective restrictions and ideological tendencies. Berger's thoughts on the sociology of religion are still relevant today, especially in the context of a pluralistic Indonesian society in the context of caring for diversity. This research method is qualitative, with literacy study techniques that refer to Berger's works, as well as through literacy studies of other relevant writings. The results of this research are expected to enrich theoretical studies for sociology scholars, especially those interested in the sociology of religion.
Menginisiasi Kerja Sama Riset Internasional yang Setara, Adil, dan Bermanfaat bagi Indonesia Nugroho, Agustinus Hadi
Journal of Politics and Democracy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Politics and Democracy (September)
Publisher : Indonesian Democracy Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61183/polikrasi.v1i1.5

Abstract

International research collaboration can be understood as a social process within the realm of research, as it embodies a dialectical interplay between the interests of Indonesia and those of foreign partners. As a social process, international research collaboration should thus be analyzed through the theoretical lens of dialectical materialism. Within this framework, it is essential to distinguish between the infrastructural (base) and superstructural (superstructure) aspects. The infrastructural aspect of international research collaboration lies in its financial dimension, while the superstructural aspects encompass institutional and knowledge-related dimensions. Optimizing the benefits of international research collaboration requires more than merely proposing practical policy measures; it also demands an understanding of the preconditions that shape the ecosystem of such collaboration. These preconditions particularly concern latent inequalities that often go unnoticed in the relationships between local and foreign partners. By recognizing and addressing these underlying asymmetries, the government can better formulate policy strategies grounded in principles of equity, thereby fostering international research collaborations that serve Indonesia’s national interests more effectively and sustainably.
Co-Authors Diputra, Tito Briyan