Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Law and Society
Triasmono, Hari
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparison between Customary Legal Systems and Modern Legal Systems in the Context of Globalization Triasmono, Hari; Ruslie, Ahmad Sholikhin
International Journal of Law and Society Vol 3 No 1 (2024): International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)
Publisher : NAJAHA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59683/ijls.v3i1.76

Abstract

The transformation of traditional legal systems is an essential issue in the context of globalization that affects the sustainability of conventional and modern legal systems. A comparison between these two legal systems can provide valuable insights into efforts to understand the impact of this transformation. This research aims to analyze the differences and similarities between customary legal systems and modern legal systems in the context of globalization and to understand the impact of the transformation of traditional legal systems on society and legal policy. This type of research is comparative research with a qualitative approach. Data was obtained from document studies, interviews and literature studies. Data analysis in this research was carried out using a comparative method, namely comparing data received from the customary and modern legal systems. The research results show that the transformation of traditional legal systems in the context of globalization has given rise to new dynamics between customary and contemporary legal systems. The pressure of globalization makes traditional legal systems adapt to modern legal standards, threatening the validity of customary legal systems. However, globalization also opens the door to changes in traditional legal systems, creating complexity when comparing the two legal systems.
Konsep Pengaturan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) Berdasarkan Prinsip Keadilan Proporsional Triasmono, Hari; Warka, Made; Setyaji, Sri; Hufron, Hufron
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9, No 4 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i4.11880

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation of Fixed-Term Employment Agreements (PKWT) based on the principle of proportional justice in the Indonesian labor law system. This principle emphasizes the importance of a balance between the rights of employers to business flexibility and the rights of workers to protection and job security. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory, conceptual, philosophical, historical approach, as well as a case and comparative approach. The primary legal materials analyzed include the Employment Law, the Job Creation Law, and the Constitutional Court Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023. The results of the study show that changes to the regulation of PKWT through the Job Creation Law, especially the elimination of the maximum duration limit for extension, have created legal uncertainty for workers and opened up opportunities for abuse by employers. PKWT that is not strictly limited has the potential to harm workers, especially in terms of compensation and social security rights. Current regulations tend to favor employer flexibility, so there needs to be a rearrangement that prioritizes the principle of proportional justice. This justice must be reflected in the limitation of the use of PKWT for work that is truly temporary, the provision of adequate compensation, and strict supervision by the state. Theoretically, this finding confirms that employment law must be based on social justice that places humans at the center of policy, not merely objects of the labor market.
Konsep Pengaturan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) Berdasarkan Prinsip Keadilan Proporsional Triasmono, Hari; Warka, Made; Setyaji, Sri; Hufron, Hufron
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i4.11880

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation of Fixed-Term Employment Agreements (PKWT) based on the principle of proportional justice in the Indonesian labor law system. This principle emphasizes the importance of a balance between the rights of employers to business flexibility and the rights of workers to protection and job security. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory, conceptual, philosophical, historical approach, as well as a case and comparative approach. The primary legal materials analyzed include the Employment Law, the Job Creation Law, and the Constitutional Court Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023. The results of the study show that changes to the regulation of PKWT through the Job Creation Law, especially the elimination of the maximum duration limit for extension, have created legal uncertainty for workers and opened up opportunities for abuse by employers. PKWT that is not strictly limited has the potential to harm workers, especially in terms of compensation and social security rights. Current regulations tend to favor employer flexibility, so there needs to be a rearrangement that prioritizes the principle of proportional justice. This justice must be reflected in the limitation of the use of PKWT for work that is truly temporary, the provision of adequate compensation, and strict supervision by the state. Theoretically, this finding confirms that employment law must be based on social justice that places humans at the center of policy, not merely objects of the labor market.
Co-Authors Hufron Hufron, Hufron Made Warka, Made Ruslie, Ahmad Sholikhin Setyaji, Sri