Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Nuralify, Mohammad
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum atas Penguasaan Hak Milik Tanah pada Sertifikat Ganda Rahmawati, Puji; Arbi, Syafira Rahmania; Nuralify, Mohammad
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1100

Abstract

The issuance of duplicate land ownership certificates gives rise to legal issues that culminate in civil disputes between parties holding certificates over the same plot of land. These problems are not only caused by the involved parties but also by the negligence of land registration officials. This study aims to identify the forms of unlawful acts in cases of land control based on duplicate certificates, as well as to examine the mechanisms for resolving land ownership disputes in such cases in Indonesia. The research method employed is normative juridical, using data collection techniques based on statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study indicate that an unlawful act occurs when a person takes control of land that is legally owned by another party, whether an individual or a legal entity. Proof of lawful land ownership is essential to ensure legal certainty, which can be demonstrated through authentic deeds such as a Sale and Purchase Deed (Akta Jual Beli or AJB) issued by a Land Deed Official (Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah or PPAT). To minimize disputes, firm law enforcement is required, along with the active role of the National Land Agency (Badan Pertanahan Nasional or BPN) in resolving disputes fairly through deliberation, mediation, and facilitation. In practice, land dispute resolution is not only carried out by the BPN but can also be pursued through the General Courts and the Administrative Court
Default of the Construction Service Provider as a Reason for Termination of the Construction Work Contract Pratama, Febrian Rizki; Abdillah, Maulana Farhan; Nuralify, Mohammad; Damayanti, Astri; AR, Febriyanti Putri
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5165

Abstract

Termination of a construction contract can be carried out if it arises as a result of failure to fulfill the obligations of one of the parties, in this case a wanprestatie occurs. Therefore, what form of wanprestatie is committed by the service provider is the reason for terminating the contract and what legal remedies can be taken to terminate the construction contract due to wanprestatie. The aim of this research is to analyze the form of wanprestatie by service provider as a reason for terminating the contract and analyzing the legal remedies taken by the construction service provider to terminate the contract due to wanprestatie. This research uses normative legal research using statute approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches. The first result is that the form of contract termination is in the form of a fundamental error with a benchmark, namely a form of wanprestatie committed by the service provider as a reason for terminating the contract by the service user, namely in the form of a fundamental error, such as work delays with a benchmark, namely the service provider has not been able to fulfill the work progress specified. It is agreed by the service user or service provider that they have not carried out their work after one month of signing the contract so that the service user gives a warning letter to the service provider to be given time to correct their negligence within the specified time period, which is done by giving a warning letter 3 (three) times. The second result is that service providers can take legal remedies against unilateral contract termination if they go through non-litigation, then they can take deliberation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration. Not only that, settlement can also be done through a dispute council. If using litigation, the service provider can make file a lawsuit in the District Court.
Co-Authors Abdillah, Maulana Farhan AR, Febriyanti Putri Arbi, Syafira Rahmania Damayanti, Astri Pratama, Febrian Rizki