Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Ahli Waris Terkait Hibah yang Merugikan Hak Mutlak Ahli Waris Nafingatul Fitri, Irma; Sriwidodo, Joko; Sri Marniati, Felicitas
Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jmi.v2i2.163

Abstract

Dalam pemberian hibah tidak boleh melanggar dan merugikan bagian mutlak (legitime portie) ahli waris menurut undang-undang. Fenomena yang terjadi dalam masyarakat masih seringkali terjadi dalam hal pemberian hibah yang diberikan dengan melanggar bagian mutlak (legitime portie) ahli waris. Peneliti merumuskan permasalahan yaitu bagaimana akibat hukum terkait hibah yang merugikan hak mutlak ahli waris dan bagaiman aperlindungan ahli waris terkait hibah yang merugikan hak mutlak ahli waris. Dalam penelitian ini peneliti menggunakan teori akibat hukum menurut Soeroso dan teori perlindungan hukum menurut Philiphus M Hadjon. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian hukum kepustakaan atau data sekunder dengan sumber bahan-bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Adapun pendekatan penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah Pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, Pendekatan konseptual, Pendekatan kasus, Pendekatan analitis dan tekhnik pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan cara mengidentifikasi dan menginventarisasi aturan hukum positif, literatur buku, jurnal dan sumber bahan huum lainnya. Untuk teknik analisa bahan hukum dilakukan dengan penafsiran hukum (interpretasi) gramatikal dan sistematis. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa akibat hukum atas hibah yang tidak melanggar hak mutlak ahli waris, akan memperoleh perlindungan hukum bagi penerima hibah sebagai pemilik yang sah. Namun atas hibah yang melanggar hak mutlak ahli waris dan dituntut oleh legitimaris, maka ketetapan hibah dibatalkan dan lenyapnya kedudukan hukum penerima hibah dan mengenai perlindungan hukum ahli waris diberikan melalui 2 (dua) cara yaitu perlindungan hukum preventif dan represif, yang diberikan melalui perundang-undangan, perhitungan hak mutlak dan hak untuk menuntut
Menelisik Kepastian Hukum Akta Wasiat atas Pencairan Deposito Pewaris yang Ditahan oleh Bank Alghaffar, Anandito Fadli; Sri Marniati, Felicitas; Sailellah, Sirajudin
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol 12 No 1 (2025): POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v12i1.12491

Abstract

A will serves as strong evidence in the event of a legal dispute in court and is regulated under Article 875 of the Civil Code. A will may include instructions regarding the provision of a deposit. In cases where a beneficiary, designated as an heir according to the testament, seeks to withdraw the deposit from the Bank, the Bank may withhold it, raising issues regarding the legal consequences of such withholding and the assurance of legal certainty concerning the beneficiary’s right to withdraw the deposit under the will. To address these issues, the researcher applied the theory of Legal Consequences by R. Soeroso and the theory of Legal Certainty by John Michiel Otto. The study employed a normative juridical research method, using library research and secondary data obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The research approach included statutory, conceptual, analytical, and case-based analyses. Legal data were collected through identification and inventory of applicable laws, books, journals, and other relevant legal references, and were analyzed using grammatical interpretation, analogy, and legal reasoning. The research findings reveal that legal consequences arise when the Bank withholds the deposit. While the legal relationship between the testator and the Bank terminates, the beneficiary acquires rights and obligations upon the disbursement of the deposit. Furthermore, legal certainty is achieved through court decisions, which ensure the enforceability of the will and the beneficiary’s right to access the deposit.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum PPAT atas Dana BPHTB yang Tidak Disetorkan ke Kas Negara: Suatu Kajian Yuridis Ayulina, Jennitri; Ismed, Mohamad; Sri Marniati, Felicitas
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol 12 No 1 (2025): POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v12i1.12497

Abstract

This study examines the legal consequences and responsibilities of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) regarding entrusted Land and Building Rights Acquisition Fee (BPHTB) payments that are not deposited into the state treasury. Article 25 paragraph (2) of the Regulation of the Minister of ATR/BPN No. 3 of 2023 requires proof of BPHTB payment in every transfer of land or building rights. However, in practice, clients often entrust BPHTB payments to PPAT, and some officials fail to forward the funds, creating legal problems. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, analytical, and case approaches, this research analyzes legal materials from primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The results show that PPAT who fails to deposit entrusted BPHTB funds may face criminal sanctions under Articles 372–376 of the Criminal Code, particularly Article 374 on embezzlement, since Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 does not explicitly regulate such sanctions. The implication is the need for strict legal accountability of PPAT to ensure legal certainty, protect the public, and safeguard state revenue.
Prinsip Le Mort Saisit Le Vif dalam Peralihan HakTanah: Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pembeli terhadap Penolakan Ahli Waris Ismail, Ismail; Sri Marniati, Felicitas; Sailellah, Sirajudin
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol 12 No 1 (2025): POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v12i1.12499

Abstract

The principle of le mort saisit le vif provides that upon the death of a person, all rights and obligations are immediately transferred to their heirs. These include both assets and liabilities, such as the obligation to complete a land sale and purchase transaction initiated by the deceased during their lifetime. A key issue arises when heirs reject the making of a Sale and Purchase Deed (Akta Jual Beli) for a transaction conducted by the testator, raising questions about the validity of the transfer of land rights and the legal protection available to the buyer. This research applies the theory of legal protection and the theory of land registration, using a normative juridical method based on legal literature and secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The approaches include the Legislative Approach, Conceptual Approach, Analytical Approach, and Case Approach. Legal materials are analyzed using grammatical and systematic interpretation, supported by legal construction methods. The results show that the transfer of land rights through a Sale and Purchase Deed rejected by the heirs cannot be implemented, as maintaining land registration data requires a deed made before an authorized Land Deed Official (PPAT). To ensure legal protection, the buyer may pursue legal action against the heirs for unlawful acts, since heirs inherit not only assets but also obligations, including the duty to finalize the sale and purchase transaction. This obligation entails executing and signing the deed before a PPAT, thereby upholding the principle of le mort saisit le vif and ensuring legal certainty in land registration.