Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia ALWAQFU Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi dan Wakaf
Cakra Arbas
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Jaminan Perlindungan Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme: Optimalisasi Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Korban Syarifah Citra Meidina; Alphi Sahari; Cakra Arbas
Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Nusa Putra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52005/rechten.v6i1.165

Abstract

Compensation is a form of indemnification charged to the state as a means of protection for victims of terrorist crimes, aimed at reducing the burden of suffering borne by the victims and/or their families. The compensation provided should be based on the assessment of the damages suffered by the victims. This research uses a normative juridical legal research method to explore the concept of compensation for victims of terrorist crimes and the factors that hinder the provision of compensation to them. The findings obtained from this research are that the concept of compensation for victims of terrorist crimes has been regulated in Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Terrorism Crimes. The provision of compensation to victims of terrorist crimes is carried out through the institution of LPSK (The Witness and Victim Protection Agency) as mandated by the Law. Factors that influence the provision of compensation to victims of terrorist crimes include internal obstacles, such as delays in the application procedure and the implementation of compensation due to the fact that victims can only obtain their compensation rights based on court verdicts and/or determinations. Additionally, the existing laws may not be oriented towards the interests of the victims, which is deemed contradictory to the purpose of providing legal protection, particularly for victims of terrorist crimes. There are also external obstacles, particularly from the victims themselves, where many victims are unaware of their rights as stipulated in the existing legislation due to a lack of government awareness campaigns regarding the existence of the Victim Protection Law.
REFORMULASI HUKUM PENERAPAN REHABILITASI SEBAGAI PIDANA ALTERNATIF PADA SISTEM PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PECANDU NARKOTIKA Agus Dana Putra; Mhd Teguh Syuhada Lubis; Cakra Arbas
ALWAQFU: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi dan Wakaf Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Oktober Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi dan Wakaf
Publisher : P2WP MUI Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Narkotika merupakan ancaman serius bagi kesehatan individu dan stabilitas sosial-ekonomi masyarakat. Pemerintah Indonesia mengatur penanganannya melalui Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, termasuk penerapan rehabilitasi sebagai hukuman alternatif bagi pecandu. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menelaah teori, konsep, dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait, untuk mengevaluasi penerapan rehabilitasi dalam sistem pemidanaan, mengidentifikasi problematika yang muncul, serta merumuskan reformulasi aturan hukum yang lebih efektif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rehabilitasi mencerminkan pergeseran paradigma pemidanaan dari pendekatan retributif menuju korektif dan restoratif, dengan tujuan tidak hanya memberikan efek jera tetapi juga memulihkan kondisi fisik, mental, dan sosial pecandu. Reformulasi hukum diharapkan dapat memperkuat implementasi rehabilitasi sebagai hukuman alternatif yang lebih manusiawi dan efektif dalam sistem pemidanaan narkotika.
Co-Authors Agus Dana Putra Alphi Sahari Mhd Teguh Syuhada Lubis Syarifah Citra Meidina