Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Judge's Perception of the Meaning of a Wife Not Being Able to Perform Obligations Under the Requirements of Polygam, a Study in the Amuntai Kalsum, Umi; Muzainah , Gusti
JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jils.v8i2.12231

Abstract

This research is motivated by the existence ofArticle 4 paragraph (2)Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Law Number 16 of 2019, namely that the wife cannot carry out her obligations as a wife, the wife has a disability or disease athat scannot be cured and the wife cannot give birth to offspring. Regarding the first condition, the law does not explain further or provide clear boundaries regarding what is included in a wife's obligations. Therefore, the judge, as a person who has authority and plays a role in granting or not granting permission for polygamy, can provide or clarify any obligations borne by the wife that cannot be carried out by the wife so that a husband can be given permission to practice polygamy. This research aims to find out the judge's perception in giving the meaning that the wife cannot carry out the obligations stated in the requirements for polygamy and the reasons used by the judge in giving the meaning that the wife cannot carry out the obligations. This research is empirical legal research with a qualitative and descriptive approach. This research was located at the Amuntai Religious Court. Data collection techniques are through observation, interviews and documentation with data sources namely informants from the Amuntai Class 1B Religious Court Judges. Based on the results of research conducted by the author, the meaning of a wife not being able to carry out her obligations under the requirements of polygamy is firstly, the judge in giving the meaning of a wife not being able to carry out her obligations focuses more on the benefit by looking at the facts in the trial, and secondly, the meaning of a wife not being able to carry out her obligations is the inability to carry out her obligations. Inner livelihood is caused by physical, psychological and age factors. The reason used by the judge is that judges cannot be fixated on the law, so that when adjudicating a case they need to pay attention to aspects of justice and benefit, and the next reason is because spiritual support is an absolute obligation of a wife.
Baantar Jujuran dalam Perkawinan Adat Masyarakat Banjar Muzainah , Gusti
Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): September 2019
Publisher : LPPPM STAI Darul Hikmah Bangkalan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35309/alinsyiroh.v5i2.158

Abstract

Baatar jujuran adalah prosesi adat dalam perkawinan pada masyarakat Banjar, dan dilakukan sebelum berlangsungnya perkawinan. Baatar jujuran adalah pemberian dari pihak laki2 kpd pihak perempuan, berupa sejumlah uang yang besarnya ditentukan oleh pihak perempuan. Jujuran berbeda dengan mahar. Jujuran biasanya lebih besar dari mahar, karena fungsi jujuran adalah sebagai bantuan untuk melaksanakan resepsi perkawinan dan juga untuk modal awal berumah tangga. Dalam pelaksanaan membayar jujuran, kadang diminta oleh pihak perempuan telalu tinggi, sehingga menghambat terlaksananya perkawinan, ini bertentangan dengan ajaran Islam. Disamping itu pula, ada juga yg menentukan jujuran dengan bermusyawarah sehingga tercipta kesepakatan, ini sesuai dengan ajaran Islam. Ada lagi yang menentukan jujuran dengan istilah, “sapambariâ€, artinya seikhlasnya, dan ini juga tidak bertentangan dengan ajaran Islam. Hubungan hukum adat dan hukum agama khususnya agama Islam dalam baatar jujuran di sini dapat dianalisis melalui teori receptio in complexu dan receptio a contrario