Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Dynamics of Politics and Democracy
Rapo, Kasilda
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Dinamika Pembagian Urusan Pemerintahan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah Rapo, Kasilda
Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Vol. 2 No. 12 (2024): Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal
Publisher : Al Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengapa terjadi perubahan kewenangan otonomi daerah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Daerah, serta mengetahui dan menganalisis prinsip pembagian urusan rumah tangga daerah dalam Negara Kesatuan desentralistik Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Perubahan yang terjadi adalah sebagai usaha untuk menyempurnakan Undang-Undang tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dengan harapan agar terselenggaranya pemerintahan daerah yang baik dengan berbagai dasar pertimbangan yang berbeda, sedangkan Prinsip subsidiaritas tidak dijelaskan secara eksplisit dalam berbagai peraturan Perundang-Undangan tentang pemerintahan daerah yang pernah berlaku di Indonesia. Namun semangat prinsip subsidiaritas sangat kental dalam setiap substansi Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Dinamika Pembagian Urusan Pemerintahan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah Rapo, Kasilda
Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Vol. 2 No. 12 (2024): Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal
Publisher : Al Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/mutiara.v2i12.302

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengapa terjadi perubahan kewenangan otonomi daerah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Daerah, serta mengetahui dan menganalisis prinsip pembagian urusan rumah tangga daerah dalam Negara Kesatuan desentralistik Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Perubahan yang terjadi adalah sebagai usaha untuk menyempurnakan Undang-Undang tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dengan harapan agar terselenggaranya pemerintahan daerah yang baik dengan berbagai dasar pertimbangan yang berbeda, sedangkan Prinsip subsidiaritas tidak dijelaskan secara eksplisit dalam berbagai peraturan Perundang-Undangan tentang pemerintahan daerah yang pernah berlaku di Indonesia. Namun semangat prinsip subsidiaritas sangat kental dalam setiap substansi Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Constitutional Court Decree No 90/Puu-XII/2023 Provisions on Age Requirements for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates in the Principles of the State of Law and Pancasila Democracy Sifa, Nurul Ash; Rapo, Kasilda
Dynamics of Politics and Democracy Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): February
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/dpd.v3i2.3277

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the legal consequences of Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which adds new requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates, and analyzes its implications for the constitutional system and the balance of power between state institutions in Indonesia. Research methodology: Using a normative juridical approach, this research draws upon statute analysis, constitutional theory, and judicial interpretation. It evaluates the decision based on Hans Kelsen’s legal hierarchy theory and the principle of judicial restraint within a constitutional democracy. Results: The findings show that the Constitutional Court, through this decision, has expanded its interpretive role beyond judicial review, effectively performing a legislative function. This has resulted in the creation of a new norm that was not previously regulated by law. The decision also raises concerns about the erosion of judicial neutrality and the risk of institutional imbalance, particularly between the judiciary and the legislature. Conclusions: The decision disrupts the principle of separation of powers and may set a precedent for overreach by the judiciary. It calls into question the boundaries of judicial authority and its role in upholding democratic values and the rule of law. Limitations: The study is limited to a normative-doctrinal analysis and does not include comparative perspectives or empirical data. Contribution: This paper contributes to the discourse on constitutional law by emphasizing the need for judicial neutrality and reinforcing the importance of checks and balances in maintaining a democratic constitutional order.
Constitutional Court Decree No 90/Puu-XII/2023 Provisions on Age Requirements for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates in the Principles of the State of Law and Pancasila Democracy Sifa, Nurul Ash; Rapo, Kasilda
Dynamics of Politics and Democracy Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): February
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/dpd.v3i2.3277

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the legal consequences of Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which adds new requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates, and analyzes its implications for the constitutional system and the balance of power between state institutions in Indonesia. Research methodology: Using a normative juridical approach, this research draws upon statute analysis, constitutional theory, and judicial interpretation. It evaluates the decision based on Hans Kelsen’s legal hierarchy theory and the principle of judicial restraint within a constitutional democracy. Results: The findings show that the Constitutional Court, through this decision, has expanded its interpretive role beyond judicial review, effectively performing a legislative function. This has resulted in the creation of a new norm that was not previously regulated by law. The decision also raises concerns about the erosion of judicial neutrality and the risk of institutional imbalance, particularly between the judiciary and the legislature. Conclusions: The decision disrupts the principle of separation of powers and may set a precedent for overreach by the judiciary. It calls into question the boundaries of judicial authority and its role in upholding democratic values and the rule of law. Limitations: The study is limited to a normative-doctrinal analysis and does not include comparative perspectives or empirical data. Contribution: This paper contributes to the discourse on constitutional law by emphasizing the need for judicial neutrality and reinforcing the importance of checks and balances in maintaining a democratic constitutional order.
Co-Authors Sifa, Nurul Ash