Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Anandatia, Via
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence dalam Hukum Acara Pidana: Tinjauan Yuridis dan Dampak Sosial Septiawan, Rendi; Anandatia, Via; Gustina, Adin
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember | Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/perkara.v2i4.2235

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into criminal procedure law has emerged as a significant development in enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of judicial systems. However, the implementation of AI in Indonesia remains at an early stage, with challenges such as regulatory gaps, societal trust issues, and potential algorithmic biases. This study aims to explore the potential and challenges of utilizing AI within Indonesia’s criminal procedure framework, focusing on its legal and social implications. Employing a qualitative research approach, this study combines in-depth interviews with legal experts, practitioners, and AI developers, alongside a comprehensive literature review of existing laws and academic research. The findings reveal that AI has the potential to expedite case management, enhance evidence analysis, and reduce human biases in judicial decision-making. Nevertheless, the lack of specific regulations governing AI’s use in the judiciary and the limited public trust pose significant hurdles to its effective implementation. The study also highlights the importance of adaptive legal frameworks and public education to foster transparency and accountability in AI applications. These results contribute to the broader discourse on AI integration in legal systems, particularly in developing countries, by emphasizing the need for localized strategies that address unique social and legal contexts. The implications of this research extend to policymakers and technology developers, providing insights into the regulatory and ethical considerations required for sustainable AI adoption in judicial processes. Future research is recommended to expand the scope of empirical studies and include quantitative analyses to further substantiate the findings.
A Planet in Crisis, Law on Trial: Toward a Just and Inclusive Geopolitics of Sustainability Sugiyono, Leony Franaisca; Anandatia, Via; Nandini, Gusti
Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): HAKIM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/cynexg29

Abstract

The global ecological crisis, marked by climate change, biodiversity loss, and natural resource degradation, has revealed the limitations of existing legal frameworks in ensuring environmental sustainability. While international environmental law has developed significantly through instruments such as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, its implementation remains deeply uneven due to geopolitical power imbalances, historical responsibilities, and disparities in technical and financial capacities between the Global North and South. This study critically examines the intersection of environmental law and global geopolitics, arguing that legal mechanisms alone are insufficient without addressing underlying structural inequalities. Employing a multidisciplinary approach that integrates international law, political ecology, and sustainability studies, the research highlights three major areas: the evolution of international legal instruments, the geopolitical asymmetries in their implementation, and the emergence of inclusive and just sustainability initiatives. Furthermore, the study underscores the transformative role of non-state actors, particularly indigenous communities, civil society organizations, and transnational grassroots movements, in shaping global environmental governance. The novelty of this research lies in its emphasis on law as a political and normative tool to challenge dominant paradigms and reconstruct a more equitable global environmental order. The findings offer strategic insights for policymakers, legal scholars, and advocacy groups committed to promoting ecological justice in the era of the climate crisis.
Co-Authors Gustina, Adin Nandini, Gusti Septiawan, Rendi Sugiyono, Leony Franaisca