Paklioy, Ronny Putra Dirgantara
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penerapan Konsep Plea Bargaining Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia Paklioy, Ronny Putra Dirgantara; Titahelu, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs; Latumaerissa, Denny
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 8 (2024): Volume 4 Nomor 8, Oktober 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v4i8.2473

Abstract

Introduction: The principle of simple, fast and low cost justice is a principle in the Indonesian judicial system that requires the implementation of law enforcement to be able to provide protection and legal certainty in the judicial process. The plea bargaining system is one of the alternatives that can be used to overcome the burden of cases in court and realize the principle of simple, fast and low cost justice as a principle in the Indonesian criminal justice system optimally.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to review and analyze the application of the plea bargaining system and the obstacles in the application of the plea bargaining system in the Indonesian justice system.Methods of the Research: The method used in this writing is normative juridical with a statutory approach, comparative approach, and concept approach.Results of the Research: Based on this paper, it can be concluded that plea bargaining system is a part of criminal justice system that is developed and maintained by many countries up to now, both countries with common law system and countries with civil law system. Plea bargaining system is a system that has not been recognized in the Indonesian judicial system, however, this system can be a solution to the problem of accumulation of cases in the courts, the implementation process must be carried out comprehensively, and adjustments need to be made to the Indonesian criminal justice system so that it can be implemented and implemented optimally and effectively.
Parallel Investigation As An Effective Step In Handling Cases Of Money Laundering Crimes Arising From Forestry And Environmental Crimes Paklioy, Ronny Putra Dirgantara; Sopacua, Margie Gladies
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2023): Volume 3, Nomor 1, April 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sanisa.v3i1.1544

Abstract

Introduction: Parallel Investigation, is a concept in the enforcement of money laundering or money laundering, in Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering or hereinafter referred to as the Anti-Money Laundering Law Article 74 stipulates that "The ML investigation is carried out by investigators predicate offense in accordance with the provisions of the procedural law and the provisions of laws and regulations, unless otherwise provided for by this law”. Money laundering is a further crime from the predicate crime, one of the predicate crimes that has a high risk of money laundering is forestry and environmental crimes, the provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering Law article 74 and the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision Number 15/PUU-XIX/2021, which applies the principle of parallel investigation in money laundering originating from forestry and environmental crimes.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to find out the effectiveness of using the principle of parallel investigation in handling money laundering offenses originating from forestry and environmental crimes.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that Parallel Investigation is an effective step in handling money laundering offenses arising from forestry and environmental crimes because Parallel investigation is a concept where investigators of predicate crimes, namely PPNS, can handle money laundering offenses investigations if there are findings in the investigation of predicate crimes, which will reduce the total costs. and it will not take a long time because there is no longer a need for a new investigation by combining ML investigations and forestry and environmental crimes into a single investigation process.