Suwandi, Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY SEBAGAI PENENTU MOTIF TINDAK PIDANA PENGEDARAN NARKOTIKA MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL DI SIDOARJO Suwandi, Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning; Hermono, Budi
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol. 5 No. 03 (2018): Novum : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v2i2.55321

Abstract

The core issue in this research is the emergence of a new method of drug distribution through social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram. This study focuses on the distribution of narcotics through social media within the jurisdiction of the Sidoarjo City Police Resort and examines it using the rational choice theory. This gives rise to the following problems: 1. What motives do drug dealers have for distributing drugs through social media, as viewed from the perspective of rational choice theory? 2. What actions do the police take against the criminal act of drug distribution through social media? The purpose of this research is to identify and analyze the motives of drug dealers in distributing through social media, as well as the actions taken by the police against the criminal act of drug distribution through social media. The research methodology used is qualitative empirical legal research. The study was conducted at the Sidoarjo Class IIA Penitentiary and the Sidoarjo City Police Resort. The research method involves interviews as primary legal data and legislation as secondary legal data. The results of this research are as follows: 1. The distribution of narcotics through social media has benefits and costs. In this study, the benefits outweigh the constraints or losses incurred. 2. The actions taken by the police against the distribution of narcotics through social media. Individual may consciously commit a criminal act due to the presence of rational choice theory, whereby a person considers the benefits and losses they may incur.
Transparency Disparities in the Social Health Insurance System: The Rights of Social Security Agency Patients to Cost Details in the Indonesian Case-Based Groups System Aida, Lutfi Nur; Suwandi, Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning; Rato, Dominikus; Ohoiwatun, Y A Triana
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review Vol 5, No 3 (2025): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Postgraduate Program in Law, Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pamali.v5i3.3460

Abstract

Introduction: There is an information disparity between Social Security Administration Agency patients and independent patient, where Social Security Administration Agency patients do not gget detail of service fees because the INA-CBG (Indonesia Case Based Groups) payment system is based on the diagnosis group, white independent patients get a complete cost receipt.Purposes of the Research: The Purpose of this study is to analyze the inequality of information transparency in the National Health Insurance system, especially related to the rights of Social Security Administration Agency patients to the details of service fees in the INA-CBG payment system. BPJS patients do not get details of costs like independent patients even though the use the same health facilities and evaluate the impact of the absence of such information on patients’ rights to transparency and accountability of health services.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, namely legal research concucted by examiningliterature materials consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal material. This research uses a statute approach and an analyrical approach.Results Main Findings of the Research: The absence of detailed costs for Social Security Administration Agency patients has the pontential to violate the right to public information and consumer protection, which ultimately weekens the position of patients in objecting to the healt services received. This alsi reduces transparency and accountability in the implementation of the National Health Insurance, thereby hindering efforts to evaluate and improve the health service system for the community.