Rajib Aliwafa Zarkasy
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGARUH MODERNISASI TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN HUKUM WARIS ADAT DI JAWA Bachtiar, Ammar Rizqi; Zhalma Rachmanya Chanticka Putrie; Rajib Aliwafa Zarkasy
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 9 No. 5 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v9i4.8413

Abstract

Modernisasi telah membawa dampak signifikan pada berbagai aspek kehidupan masyarakat, termasuk dalam pelaksanaan hukum waris adat di Jawa. Hukum waris adat, yang telah lama dipegang teguh oleh masyarakat Jawa, mulai mengalami perubahan dalam penerapannya akibat adanya pengaruh nilai-nilai modern. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi bagaimana modernisasi mempengaruhi pemahaman dan praktik hukum waris adat di Jawa. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan gabungan (mixed methods), penelitian ini menemukan bahwa modernisasi telah menggeser pemahaman masyarakat terhadap nilai-nilai tradisional, termasuk hukum waris. Generasi muda cenderung mengadopsi pendekatan yang lebih modern dalam pembagian warisan, yang kadang tidak sejalan dengan norma-norma adat. Di samping itu, adanya pengaruh hukum nasional juga berperan dalam mereduksi peran hukum waris adat dalam kehidupan sehari-hari masyarakat Jawa. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan pentingnya menjaga keseimbangan antara tradisi dan modernitas dalam pelaksanaan hukum waris agar tetap relevan di tengah perkembangan zaman.
PELAKSANAAN RESTITUSI BAGI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN INVESTASI DENGAN SKEMA ROBOT TRADING: STUDI KASUS DI LEMBAGA PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN (LPSK) Rajib Aliwafa Zarkasy; Maria Novita Apriyani
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i2.8575

Abstract

Fraudulent investment schemes using the Viral Blast Global robot-trading platform caused substantial financial losses and raised legal problems in fulfilling victims’ rights to restitution. This study aims to analyze the implementation of restitution for victims of fraudulent investment crimes using a robot-trading scheme, as well as the obstacles faced by the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) in fulfilling victims’ rights. This research employs an empirical juridical method with case, structural, and statutory approaches based on the KUHAP, Law Number 31 of 2014, Government Regulation Number 35 of 2020, Government Regulation Number 7 of 2018, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2022. The data were obtained from interviews at LPSK and secondary legal materials, including official documents and the Surabaya District Court Decision Number 1466/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Sby. The findings show that LPSK has carried out administrative verification, substantive examination, the establishment of the Compensation Assessment Team, and the submission of restitution before the court decision. However, the implementation of restitution faces obstacles in the form of overlapping execution authority, difficulties in proving victims’ financial losses, and low victim participation. The analysis also shows that the court ruling assigning execution duties to LPSK creates disharmony with the existing legal framework, since execution should legally fall under the authority of the prosecutor. This study concludes that restitution implementation in the Viral Blast Global case has been carried out, but it still requires regulatory harmonization, clearer execution mechanisms, and a more adaptive evidentiary framework for digital-based crimes.Keywords: Restitution; Victims’ Rights; Fraud Offenses; Robot Trading; LPSK.