Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementasi Pembayaran Zakat Emas Di Nagari Bangko Kecamatan Renah Pembarap Risnawati, Melia; IKhwan; Zulfan
Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024): Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam
Publisher : LPPM IAIN Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47945/tasamuh.v16i2.1328

Abstract

This research aims to understand further how gold zakat payments that do not comply with the haul (time requirements) in Nagari Bangko, Renah Pembarap District, are a problem that requires serious attention. This article analyzes various factors that cause this discrepancy, including a lack of understanding of the concept of zakat and administrative obstacles. The method used is qualitative, using data collection techniques through literature studies and interviews with local communities. Through this case study, this article also highlights the social and economic consequences of non-haul implementation. In addition, this article emphasizes the importance of education, better understanding of zakat regulations, and administrative improvements to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of the gold zakat program in Nagari Bangko. Thus, collaboration between zakat institutions, the government and local communities is key in resolving this challenge and increasing the benefits felt by the community. The author draws conclusions. In the context of implementing gold zakat payments in Nagari Bangko, Renah Pembarap District, it can be concluded that this step is not only an effort to fulfill religious obligations, but is also an important instrument in building the social and economic sustainability of the local community. Through effective gold zakat management, society can experience increased prosperity and strengthen social ties within the community.
Dilalah Lafzhiyah In The Hanafiyah Version From The Perspective Of Syafi'iyyah: A Case Study Of The Law Of Ai (Artificial Intelligence) As A Substitute For Mufti Yuliano, Firsta; Risnawati, Melia; Bahar, Muchlis; Firdaus, Firdaus
Hukum Islam Vol 26, No 1 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/hi.v26i1.31417

Abstract

This article discusses the concept of Dilalah Lafzhiyah in the Hanafi school of thought by reviewing it from the Shafi'i perspective and applying it to contemporary cases involving the use of artificial intelligence (AI) as a substitute for muftis. The development of AI technology capable of generating religious answers raises questions regarding the legitimacy of AI's role in providing religious information such as fatwas. This issue requires an analysis of usul fiqh, particularly in the discussion of ad-dilalah as the main instrument for understanding and deriving laws from the texts of the Qur'an and Sunnah. In usul al-fiqh, the Hanafi and Shafi'i schools of thought have different methods of classifying and using ad-dilalah. The Hanafi school divides dilalah into two broad categories: dilalah lafzhiyyah and dilalah ghairu lafzhiyyah, while the Shafi'i school divides it into dilalah manthuq and mafhum. This study uses a descriptive-comparative analysis method by examining the main literature of both schools and then applying it to arguments related to fatwa authority. The results of the study show that, terminologically, there are differences in expression between the Hanafi and Shafi'i schools, but substantively, many concepts have equivalent meanings. For example, the concepts of Ibarah Nash, Isyarah Nash, and Iqtidha' Nash in Hanafiyah are comparable to Manthuq in the jumhur ulama. Similarly, Dilalah Nash in Hanafiyah is equivalent to Mafhum Muwafaqah in the jumhur. However, the main difference lies in Mafhum Mukhalafah, which is recognized by the jumhur ulama but not by Hanafiyah. In the context of AI as a substitute for muftis, the Shafi'i approach, which accepts mafhum mukhalafah, tends to reject the legitimacy of AI as an independent mufti, because it understands ahl adz-dzkr as rational and competent subjects. Conversely, the Hanafi approach, which does not consider mafhum mukhalafah as evidence, opens up a more limited scope of analysis on the function of AI as a tool, not as an authority on fatwas.