Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dan Problematikanya Dalam Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 MARET 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

abstract
Ketepatan Penerapan Kompetensi Absolut terhadap Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Penguasa Oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum (Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt Pst) Muhammad Arifadi Nugroho; Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 MARET 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The General Election Commission (KPU) as the defendant in District Court Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt Pst, questioned the absolute competence of the district court in adjudicating the decision because the lawsuit filed by the PRIMA party was due to unlawful acts committed by the KPU. In this paper, the researcher formulates the first problem formulation of how the accuracy of the Central Jakarta District Court in adjudicating Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn. Jkt Pst based on the teachings of judicial competence and secondly how the form of Unlawful Acts of the Ruler committed by the KPU in Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn. Jkt Pst according to applicable law. This research uses normative legal research methods which examine legislation, norms, laws, and related theories to determine the form of unlawful acts of the authorities and the competence of the court. The results of the study explain that the accuracy of the district court in adjudicating the lawsuit of unlawful acts of the ruler is not appropriate because in the doctrine of legal norms, the theory of Absolute Competence that has the right to adjudicate is the Administrative Court, not the District Court. The form of unlawful acts of the KPU ruler is the KPU's actions in managing the SIPOL web and not fully implementing the decision of BAWASLU to harm the PRIMA party.
Pengaruh Penerapan E-litigation Terhadap Proses Cerai Gugat Pada Pengadilan Agama Merauke Khaerul Firman Mustari; Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 6 NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this technological era, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has implemented a form of digital service to create a simple, fast, and low-cost judicial system, namely e-court and e-litigation. It being implemented in court below supreme court entirely, one of them is Islamic court. The formulation of the problem in this study are: How does the application of e-litigation affect the divorce process at the Merauke Islamic Court? How are the efforts of the Merauke Islamic Court in encouraging justice seekers (plaintiffs/applicants) to proceed with e-litigation? The research method used is empirical legal research with a statutory approach and a sociological juridical approach. The results in this study are the effect of the application of e-litigation on the divorce process at the Merauke Islamic Court so far has not been running effectively, due to inadequate human resources and the lack of technological knowledge. The efforts of the Merauke Islamic Court in encouraging justice seekers (plaintiffs/applicants) to proceed with E-litigation are to carry out the socialization through the Merauke Islamic Court website, distributing brochures to the public, socializing in districts that are the jurisdiction of the Merauke Islamic Court.
Implementasi dan Konstruksi Ideal Pengaturan atas Limitasi Waktu dalam Gugatan Sederhana Zakaria Falyafil; Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 6 NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstact This research aims to examine the implementation and construction of ideal arrangements towards time limits of small claims courts in accordance with Article 5 paragraph (3) of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Small Claim Court. This research is a type of normative legal research using a conceptual approach, a statute approach, and a case approach. Sources of research data obtained by means of literature study by reading, citing and tracing laws and regulations, books, articles, journals, and other legal literature related to this research. The analysis was carried out by qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that in its implementation the simple lawsuit trial is divided into 3 conditions. First, small claim court with a period of less than 25 days. Second, small claim court with a period of exactly 25 days. Third, small claim court whose implementation period exceeds 25 days. Furthermore, the results of the study related to the ideal construction of the regulation of missed deadlines in a small claim court, the regulation of small claim court can refer to SEMA 2/2014, namely by assigning the presiding judge, reporting to the court the reasons for the lapse of time in a simple lawsuit and case data will be entered in an electronic-based case management information system. In the course of the trial, the judge can also give discretion over the time limit for the trial of a simple lawsuit by extending the examination time, which can only be fulfilled under certain conditions. For example, if both parties agree to make peace.