Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dan Problematikanya Dalam Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 MARET 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

abstract
Ketepatan Penerapan Kompetensi Absolut terhadap Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Penguasa Oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum (Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt Pst) Muhammad Arifadi Nugroho; Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 MARET 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The General Election Commission (KPU) as the defendant in District Court Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt Pst, questioned the absolute competence of the district court in adjudicating the decision because the lawsuit filed by the PRIMA party was due to unlawful acts committed by the KPU. In this paper, the researcher formulates the first problem formulation of how the accuracy of the Central Jakarta District Court in adjudicating Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn. Jkt Pst based on the teachings of judicial competence and secondly how the form of Unlawful Acts of the Ruler committed by the KPU in Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn. Jkt Pst according to applicable law. This research uses normative legal research methods which examine legislation, norms, laws, and related theories to determine the form of unlawful acts of the authorities and the competence of the court. The results of the study explain that the accuracy of the district court in adjudicating the lawsuit of unlawful acts of the ruler is not appropriate because in the doctrine of legal norms, the theory of Absolute Competence that has the right to adjudicate is the Administrative Court, not the District Court. The form of unlawful acts of the KPU ruler is the KPU's actions in managing the SIPOL web and not fully implementing the decision of BAWASLU to harm the PRIMA party.
Co-Authors Maghriby Soka Saputro Muhammad Arifadi Nugroho