Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.288
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dan Problematikanya Dalam Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 MARET 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

abstract
Ketepatan Penerapan Kompetensi Absolut terhadap Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Penguasa Oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum (Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt Pst) Muhammad Arifadi Nugroho; Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 MARET 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The General Election Commission (KPU) as the defendant in District Court Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt Pst, questioned the absolute competence of the district court in adjudicating the decision because the lawsuit filed by the PRIMA party was due to unlawful acts committed by the KPU. In this paper, the researcher formulates the first problem formulation of how the accuracy of the Central Jakarta District Court in adjudicating Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn. Jkt Pst based on the teachings of judicial competence and secondly how the form of Unlawful Acts of the Ruler committed by the KPU in Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn. Jkt Pst according to applicable law. This research uses normative legal research methods which examine legislation, norms, laws, and related theories to determine the form of unlawful acts of the authorities and the competence of the court. The results of the study explain that the accuracy of the district court in adjudicating the lawsuit of unlawful acts of the ruler is not appropriate because in the doctrine of legal norms, the theory of Absolute Competence that has the right to adjudicate is the Administrative Court, not the District Court. The form of unlawful acts of the KPU ruler is the KPU's actions in managing the SIPOL web and not fully implementing the decision of BAWASLU to harm the PRIMA party.
Pengaruh Penerapan E-litigation Terhadap Proses Cerai Gugat Pada Pengadilan Agama Merauke Khaerul Firman Mustari; Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 6 NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this technological era, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has implemented a form of digital service to create a simple, fast, and low-cost judicial system, namely e-court and e-litigation. It being implemented in court below supreme court entirely, one of them is Islamic court. The formulation of the problem in this study are: How does the application of e-litigation affect the divorce process at the Merauke Islamic Court? How are the efforts of the Merauke Islamic Court in encouraging justice seekers (plaintiffs/applicants) to proceed with e-litigation? The research method used is empirical legal research with a statutory approach and a sociological juridical approach. The results in this study are the effect of the application of e-litigation on the divorce process at the Merauke Islamic Court so far has not been running effectively, due to inadequate human resources and the lack of technological knowledge. The efforts of the Merauke Islamic Court in encouraging justice seekers (plaintiffs/applicants) to proceed with E-litigation are to carry out the socialization through the Merauke Islamic Court website, distributing brochures to the public, socializing in districts that are the jurisdiction of the Merauke Islamic Court.
Implementasi dan Konstruksi Ideal Pengaturan atas Limitasi Waktu dalam Gugatan Sederhana Zakaria Falyafil; Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 6 NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstact This research aims to examine the implementation and construction of ideal arrangements towards time limits of small claims courts in accordance with Article 5 paragraph (3) of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Small Claim Court. This research is a type of normative legal research using a conceptual approach, a statute approach, and a case approach. Sources of research data obtained by means of literature study by reading, citing and tracing laws and regulations, books, articles, journals, and other legal literature related to this research. The analysis was carried out by qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that in its implementation the simple lawsuit trial is divided into 3 conditions. First, small claim court with a period of less than 25 days. Second, small claim court with a period of exactly 25 days. Third, small claim court whose implementation period exceeds 25 days. Furthermore, the results of the study related to the ideal construction of the regulation of missed deadlines in a small claim court, the regulation of small claim court can refer to SEMA 2/2014, namely by assigning the presiding judge, reporting to the court the reasons for the lapse of time in a simple lawsuit and case data will be entered in an electronic-based case management information system. In the course of the trial, the judge can also give discretion over the time limit for the trial of a simple lawsuit by extending the examination time, which can only be fulfilled under certain conditions. For example, if both parties agree to make peace.
Peran Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Mukomuko Sebagai Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah Anis Hamidah; Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 MARET 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of the concept and role of the Mukomuko Regency Land Office as a mediator in resolving land ownership disputes, with the formulation of the problem: What are the procedures for the Mukomuko Land Office as a mediator in resolving land ownership disputes? and What are the obstacles encountered by the Mukomuko Land Office as a mediator between the parties in resolving land ownership disputes? This research is an empirical research, using a conceptual approach and a statutory approach, data collection is carried out by observation or interviews, data analysis in this study uses qualitative analysis methods. This study obtained the results that the Mukomuko district land office in dispute resolution has a role to mediate in resolving existing dispute cases, is neutral, does not take sides on any side, seeks solutions and solutions together, so that no party feels disadvantaged in the settlement event. this dispute. The settlement of land disputes is based on the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2020 concerning Handling and Settlement of Land Cases. There are two factors that hinder the mediation process, namely obstacles that come from the disputing parties and obstacles from the mediator himself.
Telaah Program Makan Bergizi Gratis Melalui Perspektif Good Governance Dan Actio Popularis (Citizen Lawsuit) Rizky Ramadhan Baried
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 MARET 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Program makan bergizi gratis (MBG) oleh Pemerintahan Prabowo-Gibran membawa harapan sebagai upaya menuju Indonesia Emas 2045, namun terdapat persoalan serius dalam legalitas, tata kelola, akuntabilitas. Akibatnya ribuan pelajar mengalami keluhan kesehatan dari program ini sampai dengan kasus keracunan yang merupakan kerugian telah diderita oleh para pelajar sebagai bagian dari warga negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kritis program makan bergizi gratis berdasarkan konsep good governance, dan probabilitas penggunaan citizen lawsuit sebagai alat partisipatoris warga negara terhadap perbaikan program ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundangan, konseptual, dan kasus; penggunaan data sekunder yang terdiri dari tiga bahan hukum dengan teknik studi pustaka dan studi dokumen akan digunakan dalam penelitian ini, didukung dengan teknik analisis preskriptif kualitatif. Program MBG ini lemah dalam pelaksanaan, bahkan persiapannya karena tidak mengindahkan nilai-nilai akuntabilitas, partisipatif, transparansi, dan legalitas – sebagaimana dimaksud konsep good governance. Akibat yang muncul yang disebabkan abainya pemerintah dalam program ini dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawabannya melalui mekanisme hukum di pengadilan: citizen lawsuit/action popularis.
Co-Authors Anis Hamidah Khaerul Firman Mustari Maghriby Soka Saputro Muhammad Arifadi Nugroho Zakaria Falyafil