Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Dian Adriawan D Tawang
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA MEMANIPULASI DATA PENDUDUK ORANG LAIN TANPA HAK UNTUK KEPENTINGAN PRIBADI (STUDI PUTUSAN NO.46/PID.SUS/2023/PN SLT): Legal Analysis Of The Criminal Act Of Manipulation Of Other Persons' Population Data Without Rights For Personal Interests (Study Of Decision No.46/PID.SUS/2023/PN SLT) Muhammad Fajriansyah Permana; Dian Adriawan D Tawang
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i4.21490

Abstract

The problem in this research is how to determine the qualifications of the offense of manipulating other people's population data without rights for personal gain and how is the modus operandi carried out by the perpetrator of the crime of manipulating other people's population data without rights for personal gain. The research method uses normative research type, which is descriptive research, with secondary data sources with primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, and analyzing data using qualitative and drawing conclusions using the deductive method. In general, offense qualifications can be recognized from objective elements and subjective elements. Modus operandi is the background of a person committing a criminal offense. The result and conclusion of this research is that the decision can be qualified as a formal crime because it is based on the actions of the perpetrator of the crime related to manipulating the population data of the victim named Karsono. The modus operandi was that the defendant sold starter packs without the need to register the starter pack with the buyer's identity, so that the Smarfren starter pack could be used directly by consumers without having to register first, and this was done unlawfully.
PERBANDINGAN HUKUM TENTANG HUKUMAN MATI MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 DAN PENAL CODE OF SINGAPORE: Comparison Of Laws On The Death Penalty According To The Criminal Code Number 1 Of 2023 And The Penal Code Of Singapore Utari Nabila Andjani; Dian Adriawan D Tawang
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i1.22195

Abstract

Indonesia and Singapore are among 68 countries that use the death penalty. The death penalty enforced in Indonesia is stated in the Criminal Code Number 1 of 2023. Singapore is the smallest country but has the highest existence of the death penalty for its people who violate the rules of the Criminal Code. The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative description of criminal acts that are sentenced to death according to Indonesian and Singaporean law and to determine the similarities and differences in the death penalty in Indonesia and Singapore. This type of research is normative law, namely research carried out by reviewing library documents or secondary data. Secondary data collection is a technique for collecting data for this research through literature studies. The results of the data analysis obtained by the State of Indonesia regulate criminal acts that are sentenced to death for crimes: sabotage and crimes during war, premeditated murder, theft, drug abuse, corruption, serious human rights violations. The State of Singapore regulates criminal acts that are sentenced to death for crimes: murder. Similarities in the death penalty, both countries still apply the death penalty and regulate sanctions. The difference regarding the legal system is that Indonesia adheres to the Civil Law legal system and Singapore adheres to the Common Law legal system
Co-Authors Muhammad Fajriansyah Permana Utari Nabila Andjani