Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ANALYSIS OF THE REGISTRATION OF A LEGAL ENTITY NAME SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THE REGISTERED TRADEMARK "CHANTIQUE" Telaumbanua, Nathanael; Kansil, Christine S. T
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1383

Abstract

Over time, trademarks have come to play a significant role in businesses established by entrepreneurs. A trademark is defined as a graphical representation that can take the form of a logo, number, or letter. The presence of a trademark in a business provides a guarantee of quality and adds unique value that attracts consumers. However, it is not uncommon for other business actors to imitate trademarks in order to reap substantial benefits. Such actions are deemed unlawful as they harm other entrepreneurs striving to develop their businesses, thereby necessitating legal protection for the affected business actors. The type of research used is normative juridical research. Normative juridical research utilizes secondary data sources as well as legal book. The normative juridical research method is a legal research approach based on legal literature, legal books, and secondary data. Legal protection for trademarks is outlined in Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. According to this regulation, the process of registering a trademark must meet several requirements: it must possess distinctiveness, comply with statutory regulations, be publicly owned, and bear no direct relation to the goods or services being registered. These requirements must be fulfilled by entrepreneurs who wish to register their trademarks. Moreover, Indonesia adheres to a constitutive trademark registration system, where the individual with full rights to a trademark is the one who first registers it commonly referred to as the "first to file" principle. The purpose of this study is to examine the regulations and legal protections for legal entities that bear similarities to a registered trademark.
ANALYSIS OF THE REGISTRATION OF A LEGAL ENTITY NAME SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THE REGISTERED TRADEMARK "CHANTIQUE" Telaumbanua, Nathanael; Kansil, Christine S. T
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1383

Abstract

Over time, trademarks have come to play a significant role in businesses established by entrepreneurs. A trademark is defined as a graphical representation that can take the form of a logo, number, or letter. The presence of a trademark in a business provides a guarantee of quality and adds unique value that attracts consumers. However, it is not uncommon for other business actors to imitate trademarks in order to reap substantial benefits. Such actions are deemed unlawful as they harm other entrepreneurs striving to develop their businesses, thereby necessitating legal protection for the affected business actors. The type of research used is normative juridical research. Normative juridical research utilizes secondary data sources as well as legal book. The normative juridical research method is a legal research approach based on legal literature, legal books, and secondary data. Legal protection for trademarks is outlined in Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. According to this regulation, the process of registering a trademark must meet several requirements: it must possess distinctiveness, comply with statutory regulations, be publicly owned, and bear no direct relation to the goods or services being registered. These requirements must be fulfilled by entrepreneurs who wish to register their trademarks. Moreover, Indonesia adheres to a constitutive trademark registration system, where the individual with full rights to a trademark is the one who first registers it commonly referred to as the "first to file" principle. The purpose of this study is to examine the regulations and legal protections for legal entities that bear similarities to a registered trademark.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN MENGGUNAKAN MEREK TERKENAL PIERRE CARDIN TANPA IZIN PEMILIK MEREK MENURUT PUTUSAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI MAHKAMAH AGUNG N. Sally, Jeane; Agus Prakosi, Dony; Telaumbanua, Nathanael; Khalisha Humaira Yusuf, Putri; AngellicaWijaya, Chelsea; Saraswati, Dita
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 10, No 9 (2023): NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v10i9.2023.4451-4460

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tetkait bagaimana perlindungan menggunakan merek terkenal dalam kasus Pierre Cardin tanpa izin pemilik merek berdasarkan Putusan No.49L/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018.  Adapun hasil penelitiannya yakni sebagai berikut.  Putusan PN No. 15/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2015/PN.NIAGA/JKT.PST Jo Putusan Kasasi No. 557K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015 mengenai merek terkenal Pierre Cardin tidak mempertimbangkan Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis secara normatif.  Hal ini dikarenakan hakim dalam pertimbangannya wajib mempertimbangkan Konvensi Paris sebagai dasar hukum internasional yang telah diratifikasi oleh Indonesia.  Lebih tepatnya pada Pasal 16 TRIPs.   Penelitian ini menghasilkan suatu kesimpulan bahwa pendaftaran merek Pierre Cardin yang telah didaftarkan oleh Alexander Satryo Wibowo (WNI) telah diatur dalam Pasal 76 ayat (1) jo Pasal 83 ayat (1) UU Merek.  Metode penulisan yang dipakai yakni berupa penelusuran literatur hukum normatif yang terdiri atas beberapa asas hukum terkait, sistematika hukum, dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan atau statute approach. Kesimpulan yang didapat adalah hakim telah memberikan mispersepsi yang salah dalam mempertimbangkan dan memutus perkara tersebut hingga tafsiran tersebut tidak sesuai dengan yang terdapat dalam Kovensi Paris. Maka dari itu, kami ingin mengulasnya menjadi suatu artikel hukum dengan judul Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Menggunakan Merek Terkenal Pierre Cardin Tanpa Izin Pemilik Merek Menurut Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Nomor 49L/PDT.SUS-HKI/2018.