Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Independence of The General Election Commission In Carrying Out Factual Verification of Political Parties General Election Participants Azis, Imron Rizki; La Dee, Mustakim; Salam, Safrin; Kaswandi, Kaswandi
JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v7i1.18370

Abstract

Political parties are an important aspect that determines the quality of holding good general elections, because political parties are the first door for candidates for government administration. Find out what are the requirements for political parties to become participants in the General Election (PEMILU) and how to carry out factual verification of political parties. The statutory and analytical approach through literature studies related to the factual verification of political parties participating in general elections. There are parties that were previously declared ineligible, then later after taking legal or administrative measures they were passed, meaning that there was implementation that was not optimal or error in the field.
Independence of The General Election Commission In Carrying Out Factual Verification of Political Parties General Election Participants Azis, Imron Rizki; La Dee, Mustakim; Salam, Safrin; Kaswandi, Kaswandi
JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Justitia Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v7i1.18370

Abstract

Political parties are an important aspect that determines the quality of holding good general elections, because political parties are the first door for candidates for government administration. Find out what are the requirements for political parties to become participants in the General Election (PEMILU) and how to carry out factual verification of political parties. The statutory and analytical approach through literature studies related to the factual verification of political parties participating in general elections. There are parties that were previously declared ineligible, then later after taking legal or administrative measures they were passed, meaning that there was implementation that was not optimal or error in the field.
THE INSTRUMENTS OF INFORMATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INDONESIA Azis, Imron Rizki; Amin Daud, Aidir; Muhtaram, Ahmad; Majid, Pipit Somefotorono
Jurnal Al-Dustur Vol 9 No 1 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/aldustur.v9i1.10449

Abstract

The term 'public information disclosure' began to receive attention in 2008, following the enactment of the Public Information Disclosure Law, which mandated the establishment of the Information Commission. This institution is expected to guarantee citizens’ rights to access information, including the resolution of information-related disputes. This study investigated the implementation and effectiveness of the existing regulations, with particular emphasis on the role and function of the Information Commission in resolving public information disputes in Indonesia. In addition, the research explored the distribution of judicial authority between the Information Commission and the judiciary. The findings revealed that the existence of the Information Commission has not yet fully ensured effective public information disclosure. Many disputes resolved by the Commission are further escalated to the courts, including to the Supreme Court at the cassation level. This process often causes delays for information requesters and is exacerbated by the non-compliance of certain public bodies with the Commission’s decisions. The study also examined the institutional status of both the Central and Regional Information Commissions. The establishment of regional commissions was found to lack independence, as their formation and status are not structurally integrated with the Central Commission. This research is significant as it centers on the resolution of information disputes and provides a comparative analysis of public information disclosure practices in Indonesia and in other countries such as Sweden, Canada, and Japan.