Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal YASIN: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Budaya AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Journal of Mandalika Literature Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Fiqi Restu Subekti
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Komparasi Pemikiran Aqidah Al-Asy’arī dan Ibnu Taimiyah Serta Revelansinya dengan Moderasi Beragama di Indonesia Fiqi Restu Subekti
Journal of Mandalika Literature Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jml.v5i4.3584

Abstract

This study examines the core theological ideas of Abū al-Ḥasan al-Asy’arī and Ibn Taymiyyah, drawing from their respective seminal works, which serve as primary references in this research. The theological perspectives of Abū al-Ḥasan al-Asy’arī are derived from his book “al-Ibānah ‘an Uṣūl ad-Diyānah,’’ while Ibn Taymiyyah’s ideas are sourced from “al-‘Aqīdah al-Wāsiṭiyah.” This analysis aims to compare the key theological concepts of these two figures to identify their similarities and differences. Furthermore, the study will contextualize the thought processes of both figures within the framework of religious moderation in Indonesia. Employing a qualitative methodology, this research focuses on reviewing prior literature that has demonstrated high validity and credibility. The analysis reveals that Abū al-Ḥasan al-Asy’arī's paradigm is considerably more moderate compared to Ibn Taymiyyah's, which is categorized as extreme. In the context of religious moderation in Indonesia, it is found that the Nahdlatul Ulama group represents the ideas of Abū al-Ḥasan al-Asy’arī, while the Wahhabi group represents Ibn Taymiyyah's thought. Therefore, it is evident that the understanding and ideas of the Nahdlatul Ulama group are more relevant for implementation in Indonesia, as they are considered moderate and align with the concept of religious moderation.
Idealism and Realism in the Study of the Philosophy of Islamic Family Law Noni Kensiwi; Fiqi Restu Subekti
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 2 (2025): December: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/xs6xfx32

Abstract

The philosophy of Islamic family law is characterized by a persistent tension between normative Idealism and contextual Realism. Idealism emphasizes fidelity to divine texts, moral universality, and transcendent legal purposes, while Realism prioritizes empirical conditions, social effectiveness, and institutional implementation. This article examines the conceptual foundations of both paradigms and analyzes their practical implications for marriage, divorce, and inheritance within contemporary Muslim societies. Employing a qualitative normative methodology based on literature review, philosophical analysis, and comparative socio-legal studies, the article demonstrates that neither Idealism nor Realism alone can adequately address the complexity of modern family law challenges. The study argues that a maqasidiyah-oriented framework offers an effective epistemological synthesis by integrating teleological reasoning with contextual sensitivity. By treating the objectives of the Sharia as the primary normative reference while incorporating empirical data as interpretive guidance, maqasidiyah reconciles textual authority with social reality. The article concludes that this synthesis enables adaptive and accountable ijtihad, strengthens substantive justice, and enhances the relevance of Islamic family law in plural and evolving legal environments.
Tradisi Tingalan di Dusun Sibarong dalam Perspektif Living Teologi Islam Fiqi Restu Subekti; H. Zuhri
AHKAM Vol 5 No 1 (2026): MARET
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.8754

Abstract

Although the concept of weton in the Javanese calendar has long been part of religious and cultural practice, studies that specifically examine the tradition of Tingalan or slametan weton as an expression of Islamic theology and local knowledge of one’s position in the cosmos remain limited. This study aims to uncover the theological values embedded in the practice of Tingalan in Sibarong and to explain how this tradition integrates Islamic teachings with local wisdom concerning the relationship between humans, nature, and God. The research employed a qualitative approach with a case study design, using participatory observation and in-depth interviews with religious leaders, community elders, and ritual practitioners as key informants. The findings show that the Tingalan tradition encompasses several core theological dimensions, including the affirmation of tauhid through the recitation of syahadat and tahlil, the manifestation of gratitude through the utterance of alhamdulillah and communal meals, the reinforcement of prayer and tawakal, sedekah as an expression of social solidarity, belief in barokah, and a cosmological awareness that interrelates humans, nature, and God. The results also indicate a pattern of continuity and adaptation, reflected in changes to the frequency of performance and the simplification of ritual elements in response to socio-economic transformations, without eroding the core theological meaning. In conclusion, the Tingalan tradition in Sibarong can be understood as a form of ilmu titen (inner awareness), namely local knowledge of the self’s relationship with nature within the framework of a lived Islamic faith, as well as a religious expression internalized in local cultural practice that contributes to the preservation of Javanese Islamic local wisdom.
Pemikiran Etika Mohamed Abid Al-Jabiri dan Relevansinya dengan Film Bidaah Ayyesa Afrilia Zalsabila; Fiqi Restu Subekti; Zuraida Nur Rahmawati
YASIN Vol 6 No 1 (2026): FEBRUARI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/yasin.v6i1.8831

Abstract

Although the cultic veneration of religious figures in popular culture has become increasingly widespread, studies that specifically examine the relevance of Mohamed Abid al-Jabiri’s notion of rational ethics for reading ethical representations in popular media remain limited. This study aimed to identify how the Arab ethical values critiqued by al-Jabiri, including Persian, Greek, Sufi, pre-Islamic Arab heritage, and Qur’anic ethics are mobilized in the narrative elements, characterization, and dialogue of the film Bidaah. An interpretive qualitative method was employed, using film text analysis as the primary data source and al-Jabiri’s works as the theoretical foundation. Data collection involved repeated viewing, scene coding, and triangulation of library sources, which were then thematically analyzed to map the ethical configurations presented in the film. The findings indicate that Bidaah exhibits problematic ethical patterns warned against by al-Jabiri, including total submission associated with Persian heritage, a tendency toward elitist rationality reflecting the influence of Greek heritage, and self-annihilating practices in Sufi variants, alongside forms of resistance rooted in Arab chivalric ethics and Qur’anic ethics of good deeds. In conclusion, al-Jabiri’s framework of rational ethics proves relevant for popular culture analysis and is capable of explaining the symbolic and social mechanisms that sustain the cultic elevation of religious figures. The implications of this study include strengthening the theoretical grounding for research in ethical philosophy and film studies, as well as offering practical recommendations for enhancing religious and media literacy and reinforcing the accountability of charismatic figures in the public sphere.
Co-Authors Ayyesa Afrilia Zalsabila H. Zuhri Noni Kensiwi Zuraida Nur Rahmawati