Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Mandalika Literature Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Fiqi Restu Subekti
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Komparasi Pemikiran Aqidah Al-Asy’arī dan Ibnu Taimiyah Serta Revelansinya dengan Moderasi Beragama di Indonesia Fiqi Restu Subekti
Journal of Mandalika Literature Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jml.v5i4.3584

Abstract

This study examines the core theological ideas of Abū al-Ḥasan al-Asy’arī and Ibn Taymiyyah, drawing from their respective seminal works, which serve as primary references in this research. The theological perspectives of Abū al-Ḥasan al-Asy’arī are derived from his book “al-Ibānah ‘an Uṣūl ad-Diyānah,’’ while Ibn Taymiyyah’s ideas are sourced from “al-‘Aqīdah al-Wāsiṭiyah.” This analysis aims to compare the key theological concepts of these two figures to identify their similarities and differences. Furthermore, the study will contextualize the thought processes of both figures within the framework of religious moderation in Indonesia. Employing a qualitative methodology, this research focuses on reviewing prior literature that has demonstrated high validity and credibility. The analysis reveals that Abū al-Ḥasan al-Asy’arī's paradigm is considerably more moderate compared to Ibn Taymiyyah's, which is categorized as extreme. In the context of religious moderation in Indonesia, it is found that the Nahdlatul Ulama group represents the ideas of Abū al-Ḥasan al-Asy’arī, while the Wahhabi group represents Ibn Taymiyyah's thought. Therefore, it is evident that the understanding and ideas of the Nahdlatul Ulama group are more relevant for implementation in Indonesia, as they are considered moderate and align with the concept of religious moderation.
Idealism and Realism in the Study of the Philosophy of Islamic Family Law Noni Kensiwi; Fiqi Restu Subekti
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 2 (2025): December: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/xs6xfx32

Abstract

The philosophy of Islamic family law is characterized by a persistent tension between normative Idealism and contextual Realism. Idealism emphasizes fidelity to divine texts, moral universality, and transcendent legal purposes, while Realism prioritizes empirical conditions, social effectiveness, and institutional implementation. This article examines the conceptual foundations of both paradigms and analyzes their practical implications for marriage, divorce, and inheritance within contemporary Muslim societies. Employing a qualitative normative methodology based on literature review, philosophical analysis, and comparative socio-legal studies, the article demonstrates that neither Idealism nor Realism alone can adequately address the complexity of modern family law challenges. The study argues that a maqasidiyah-oriented framework offers an effective epistemological synthesis by integrating teleological reasoning with contextual sensitivity. By treating the objectives of the Sharia as the primary normative reference while incorporating empirical data as interpretive guidance, maqasidiyah reconciles textual authority with social reality. The article concludes that this synthesis enables adaptive and accountable ijtihad, strengthens substantive justice, and enhances the relevance of Islamic family law in plural and evolving legal environments.
Co-Authors Noni Kensiwi