Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Razikin
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM Sadat, Anwar; Razikin; Putra, Nandio Rafael Aryo; Mawahid, Syamsul; Sugito; Novita, Wiliana Dian
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i2.1466

Abstract

This research is legal research with an analytical study of the Unlawful Acts of the General Election Commission (Onrechtmatige Overheisdaad) in Court Decision Number 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst. The purpose of this study is to determine the absolute competence of the District Court to try the unlawful acts of the General Election Commission and to analyze the basis for the judge's considerations in granting the Prima party's lawsuit. The method used in this study is normative legal research. This study found that the absolute competence of the Court to try the Unlawful Acts committed by the KPU should be the domain of the State Administrative Court, not the State Court, so that in the context of the KPU vs. Prima Party case there was an error in applying the law. In the considerations of the Central Jakarta District Court Judge who Granted the Application for the Prima Party's Unlawful Acts Lawsuit carried out by the General Election Commission of the Republic of Indonesia in the District Court Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn. Jkt Pst the panel of judges did not clearly explain what and how the considerations of the decision stating that the District Court has the authority to try the lawsuit filed by the PRIMA Party in issuing an interim decision.
Pembentukan Holding Company Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Pada PT Mining Industry Indonesia (Mind ID): Establishment of Holding Company of State-Owned Enterprises at PT Mining Industry Indonesia (Mind ID) Razikin
Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/jf.v13i2.315

Abstract

Pembentukan Holding Company Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) di Indonesia merujuk pada Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 47 tahun 2017 tentang Holding BUMN Pertambangan merupakan pelakasana dan berdasar pada ketentuan Pasal 4 ayat (4) Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Namun sampai saat ini pembentukan Holding Company BUMN tidak secara tegas diatur dalam Undang-Undang tersendiri, akan tetapi sebatas Peraturan Menteri. Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas, dimana pengaturan konsep Holding Company masih sangat terbatas dan belum secara khusus mengatur mengenai konsep dari Holding Company. Dengan begitu, diharapkan praktek monopoli yang tidak akan terjadi serta mampu membentuk Holding Company BUMN yang membawa pengaruh positif pada pendapatan negara dan masyarakat Indonesia pada umumnya. Holding Company Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) PT Mining Industry Indonesia (MIND ID) dalam meningkatkan Ekonomi Nasional dapat dilihat bahwa Pada akhir tahun 2022, Perusahaan mencatat laba bersih Rp22,5 triliun, lebih tinggi dari target RKAP 2022, meski demikian masih dianggap belum berjalan maksimal kerna menaungi beberapa perusahaan besar seperti PT ANTAM Tbk, PT Bukit Asam Tbk, PT Freeport Indonesia, PT INALUM, dan PT Timah Tbk.
ANALISIS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM Sadat, Anwar; Razikin; Putra, Nandio Rafael Aryo; Mawahid, Syamsul; Sugito; Novita, Wiliana Dian
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i2.1466

Abstract

This research is legal research with an analytical study of the Unlawful Acts of the General Election Commission (Onrechtmatige Overheisdaad) in Court Decision Number 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn Jkt.Pst. The purpose of this study is to determine the absolute competence of the District Court to try the unlawful acts of the General Election Commission and to analyze the basis for the judge's considerations in granting the Prima party's lawsuit. The method used in this study is normative legal research. This study found that the absolute competence of the Court to try the Unlawful Acts committed by the KPU should be the domain of the State Administrative Court, not the State Court, so that in the context of the KPU vs. Prima Party case there was an error in applying the law. In the considerations of the Central Jakarta District Court Judge who Granted the Application for the Prima Party's Unlawful Acts Lawsuit carried out by the General Election Commission of the Republic of Indonesia in the District Court Decision Number: 757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn. Jkt Pst the panel of judges did not clearly explain what and how the considerations of the decision stating that the District Court has the authority to try the lawsuit filed by the PRIMA Party in issuing an interim decision.
Co-Authors Mawahid, Syamsul Novita, Wiliana Dian Putra, Nandio Rafael Aryo SUGITO Syamsiar, Syamsiar