Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TUJUAN, PROSEDUR, DAN MODEL EVALUASI KURIKULUM: PERSPEKTIF KAJIAN SISTEMATIS Ananda, Reza; Yusadi, Ardini; Zein, Wahyuli Lius
PRODU: Prokurasi Edukasi Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Juli-Desember 2024
Publisher : UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/p-prokurasi.v6i2.10872

Abstract

Curriculum evaluation is a strategic process to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, and feasibility of an educational program. This study aims to provide a systematic overview of the objectives, procedures, and models of curriculum evaluation based on a literature review. The objectives of evaluation include program improvement, accountability to stakeholders, and determining follow-up actions for curriculum development outcomes. Evaluation procedures consist of methodological steps, both quantitative and qualitative, encompassing problem identification, data collection, result analysis, and recommendation formulation. Relevant curriculum evaluation models include Measurement, Congruence, Illumination, Educational System Evaluation, the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product), and the Microeconomic model. Each model offers a different approach, ranging from cognitive measurement to holistic evaluations based on context, processes, and outcomes. This study reveals that the selection of an evaluation model should align with specific objectives, program needs, and the conditions of curriculum implementation. The findings of this study provide a systematic guide for improving the design and implementation of curriculum evaluation across educational units. Thus, this research is expected to support continuous efforts to enhance the quality of education.
Menguji Transparansi dan Partisipasi Publik dalam Politik Legislasi: Refleksi atas Prolegnas dan Prolegda di Indonesia Putri, Mutiara; Ananda, Reza; Puja Kusuma, Erika; Dwi Cahyono, Leo
Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : PT. Meja Ilmiah Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70308/adagium.v3i2.107

Abstract

This article discusses the structural and normative obstacles to realizing meaningful public participation in the preparation of legislative programs. The National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) and Regional Legislation Program (Prolegda) serve as the primary instruments for planning statutory law making in Indonesia. Ideally, both programs should be formulated in a participatory and transparent manner to align with the needs of the public. However, in practice, the legislative planning process remains elitist and opaque, resulting in a disconnect between the enacted legal products and public aspirations. This study employs a library research method with a normative-juridical and critical-theoretical approach to examine the extent to which public participation and transparency are accommodated in the drafting of legislative programs, as well as to identify existing barriers. The findings indicate that public involvement remains symbolic and insufficiently institutionalized within the legislative system. Structural obstacles such as elite domination and normative limitations, including the lack of detailed regulations on public participation mechanisms, are identified as major factors. This study recommends strengthening participatory mechanisms and information transparency at every stage of Prolegnas and Prolegda formulation as part of a broader legal-political reform rooted in deliberative democracy.