Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MIZAN Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law
Muttaqin, Ahsan Imam
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Concept of Marital Sustenance According to Classiscal and Contemporary Fiqh Books Yono, Yono; Muttaqin, Ahsan Imam
Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32507/mizan.v8i2.3189

Abstract

Marriage will rise to various rights and obligations between husband and wife. Among the many rights of the wife and the obligations of the husband, one of them is sustenance. Based on the annual report at the Religious Court, economic factors (material sustenance) are more dominant as a factor causing divorce than other factors. This study aims to determine the concept of sustenance according to classical and contemporary fiqh books, and what are the similarities and differences in the concept of sustenance brought by the two books. This study uses a comparative-descriptive approach method with a type of research that is included in the category of library research. The results of this study indicate that the concept of sustenance between classical and contemporary books does not substantially have many differences, contemporary scholars still refer to the opinions or fiqh books by classical scholars, only there is an expansion of the description of the value of sustenance due to changes in the times and the needs of life. One of the differences is regarding the level of sustenance given, according to classical books, it must be adjusted to the adequacy of the recipient and the ability of the giver. Besides, according to contemporary books, it must be adjusted to the customs that already apply in the place of residence. This research has not referred to more specific books in each school of thought. In the future, research can be carried out that focuses on each school of thought.
THE CONCEPT OF MARITAL SUSTENANCE ACCORDING TO CLASSISCAL AND CONTEMPORARY FIQH BOOKS Yono, Yono; Muttaqin, Ahsan Imam
JURNAL ILMU SYARIAH Vol 12 No 2 (2024): DESEMBER
Publisher : IBN KHALDUN BOGOR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/mizan.v12i2.20385

Abstract

Marriage will raise various rights and obligations between husband and wife. Among the many rights of the wife and the obligations of the husband, one of them is sustenance. Based on the annual report of the Religious Court, economic factors (material sustenance) are more dominant as a factor causing divorce than other factors. This study aims to determine the concept of sustenance according to classical and contemporary fiqh books, and what are the similarities and differences in the concept of sustenance brought by the two books. This study uses a comparative-descriptive approach method with a type of researchincluded in the library research category. The results of this study indicate that the concept of sustenance between classical and contemporary books does not substantially have many differences, contemporary scholars still refer to the opinions or fiqh books by classical scholars, only there is an expansion of the description of the value of sustenance due to changes in the times and the needs of life. One of the differences is regarding the level of sustenance given, according to classical books, it must be adjusted to the adequacy of the recipient and the ability of the giver. Besides, according to contemporary books, it must be adjustedto the customs that already apply in the place of residence. This research has not referred to more specific books in each school of thought. In the future, research can be carried out that focuses on each school of thought.
Co-Authors Yono, Yono