Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN KOMISI ETIK KECERDASAN ARTIFISIAL (AI) DI INDONESIA Mendrofa, Idaman Jaya; Gultom, Elfrida Ratnawati; Rahmawan, Dhany; Indirahati, Novina Sri; Bustani, Simona
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 7, No 2 (2025): Vol. 7 No. 2 Edisi 2 Januari 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v7i2.2824

Abstract

Abstract: To ensure that AI technology is used in a way that is beneficial and does not harm society, this study aims to investigate the need for Indonesia to establish an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics Commission. The main issue raised in this study is whether Indonesia needs to immediately establish an AI Ethics Commission. The methodology used is normative research with descriptive analysis, and secondary data is collected from various legal sources and related literature. Based on the research findings, an ethics commission is very important to monitor and enforce the AI code of ethics in accordance with the regulations of the National Science and Technology System Law (UU IPTEK). In short, the establishment of an Artificial Intelligence Ethics Commission will encourage the ethical use of AI and reduce the possibility of misuse of technology. The establishment of this commission is suggested by this study as a calculated step to support moral standards in the use of AI in Indonesia.Keywords: Urgency, Ethics Commission, Artificial Intelligence
Perubahan Budaya Hukum dalam Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Putusan MK No.18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Debitur dan Kreditur Mendrofa, Idaman Jaya; Sitorus, Saddan; Marselino, Meigel Rio; Sari, Elsi Karika
El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat  Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/elmujtama.v5i1.5896

Abstract

This examination aims to analyze the impact of changes in the legal culture regarding the execution of fiduciary security based on Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. This decision brings significant reforms to the mechanism for executing fiduciary security by requiring the involvement of a court decision or the debtor a court decision before the execution process is carried out, ensuring a balance of legal protection between creditors and debtors. Prior to this decision, the execution of fiduciary security was commonly conducted unilaterally by the creditor, often leading to injustice for the debtor and creating an imbalance in the legal relationship between the partie. This examination employs a normative juridical approach to explore the impact of these legal provisions on the existing legal substance, culture and structure. The findings reveal a shift from a creditor-favorable approach to one that provides more equal protection for both parties, namely creditors and debtors. This change reflects efforts to enhance substantive justice in Indonesia's fiduciary system, emphasizing principles of fairness, transparency, and safeguarding the rights of all concerned parties. Furthermore, this study highlights the contribution of this decision in shaping a more adaptive and responsive legal system to meet the need for legal protection for all stakeholders in fiduciary transactions.