Nabila Hilyatunisa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Investasi Vs Judi Online: Kenali Perbedaannya dan Hindari Bahayanya Eri Kusnanto; Nabila Hilyatunisa; M. Reza Saputra; Santa Kristina Sese; M. Farel Deniyu
FUNDAMENTUM : Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): November: FUNDAMENTUM : Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/fundamentum.v2i4.426

Abstract

This research aims to identify the fundamental differences between investment and online gambling, as well as their impacts on society. The method employed is a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis through interviews with financial experts and surveys of the public to measure their understanding of both activities. The results indicate that many individuals still perceive investment as a form of gambling despite the fact that they possess distinct characteristics; investment is conducted based on analysis and long-term strategies, while online gambling is speculative and high-risk in nature. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of financial literacy education in enhancing public understanding and preventing financial losses due to online gambling practices.
Redefining Executive Power: Evolution of Presidential and Vice Presidential Roles in Indonesia’s Post-Amendment Con-stitutional System M. Reza Saputra; Nabila Hilyatunisa
LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): August : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities
Publisher : Badan Penerbit STIEPARI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56910/literacy.v4i2.2697

Abstract

The Indonesian constitutional system underwent fundamental transformation following the four amendments to the 1945 Constitution between 1999 and 2002, fundamentally redefining the constitu-tional status of the President and Vice President within the framework of democratic transition. This study examines the comprehensive changes in executive authority, institutional design, and accountability mechanisms that emerged from Indonesia's gradualist approach to constitutional reform. Using normative legal research methodology through statute and conceptual approaches, this research analyzes primary legal materials including the amended 1945 Constitution, relevant legislation, and secondary materials com-prising scholarly journals and legal literature. The study employs a multi-dimensional analytical framework encompassing institutional, authority, accountability, and relational dimensions to assess the transfor-mation of executive power. Results demonstrate that the amendments successfully established direct popular elections for both offices, implemented two-term limitations, and created robust accountability mechanisms including judicial review by the Constitutional Court and enhanced legislative oversight. The constitutional reforms eliminated the previous concentration of virtually unlimited presidential power while strengthening the Vice President's role from a nominal position to a constitutionally empowered successor. The study concludes that Indonesia's gradualist constitutional reform approach successfully balanced democratic innovation with political stability, creating an effective separation of powers system with meaningful checks and balances, though challenges remain regarding democratic consolidation and institutional effectiveness in preventing authoritarian regression.