Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Andin Wisnu Sudibyo
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Problematika Hukum Prapenuntutan dalam Pengembalian Berkas Acara Pemeriksaan oleh Penuntut Umum kepada Penyidik Andin Wisnu Sudibyo; Ade Saptomo
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v2i1.421

Abstract

This study discusses the legal vacuum that occurs in the pre-prosecution process, especially related to the absence of time limits and frequency of return of examination report files (BAP) between investigators and public prosecutors. This vacuum has the potential to hinder the principle of fast, simple, and low-cost justice that should be applied in the Indonesian criminal justice system. This study proposes solutions in the form of setting clear time limits, improving coordination between investigators and public prosecutors, and providing training to improve human resource capacity. In addition, the application of sanctions for parties who violate the provisions of pre-prosecution is an important step to ensure the smooth running of the judicial process. This study is expected to contribute to increasing the efficiency of the criminal justice system in Indonesia.
Advancing Regulations and Harmonizing Laws to Ensure Fair and Transparent Legal Certainty in Bribery and Gratification Cases Andin Wisnu Sudibyo; Megawati Barthosr
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Agustus : Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v2i3.1050

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of laws and regulations relevant to the topic discussed by employing a normative legal research method. Normative legal research is a method focused on the study of legal norms, doctrines, and principles found in legislation and scholarly writings. In this study, two main approaches are applied: the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The statute approach involves a systematic examination of legal provisions found in various legal instruments, including laws, government regulations, ministerial regulations, and other related legal sources. By analyzing these written norms, the research seeks to identify the legal basis that governs the issue under study. This approach enables the researcher to determine the extent to which existing regulations are relevant, consistent, and effectively implemented in addressing the legal problem. Meanwhile, the conceptual approach is used to explore the legal theories, principles, and definitions that underlie the legal rules being analyzed. This approach allows the study to go beyond the textual interpretation of law and delve into the conceptual framework that gives meaning to legal provisions. It includes an analysis of key legal doctrines, theoretical perspectives, and fundamental legal concepts such as justice, legal certainty, and legal responsibility. Combining these two approaches provides a comprehensive understanding of how the law is both applied and interpreted in the context of the research topic. It helps uncover inconsistencies, gaps, or overlaps in the regulatory framework, and also facilitates a deeper reflection on the rationale behind the law. Moreover, this methodology allows for the formulation of constructive legal arguments and recommendations, based on a sound interpretation of legal norms and principles.
Penataan Ulang Sistem Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional Yang Berkeadilan dan Humanis Andin Wisnu Sudibyo; Zainal Arifin Hoesein
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 03 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i03.1568

Abstract

Penanggulangan tindak pidana terorisme di Indonesia hingga saat ini masih didominasi oleh pendekatan represif yang mengedepankan aspek keamanan nasional, namun sering kali mengabaikan perlindungan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana terorisme. Padahal, sebagai bagian dari negara hukum, perlakuan terhadap setiap individu—termasuk pelaku kejahatan luar biasa seperti terorisme—harus tetap didasarkan pada prinsip keadilan, penghormatan hak asasi manusia, dan perlakuan yang manusiawi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bentuk dan kelemahan perlindungan hukum terhadap pelaku terorisme dalam sistem hukum positif Indonesia serta merumuskan bentuk penataan ulang sistem perlindungan hukum yang lebih adil dan humanis. Menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 belum sepenuhnya menjamin hak-hak hukum pelaku terorisme, terutama terkait bantuan hukum dan perlakuan selama proses hukum. Ketidaksesuaian dengan KUHAP dan instrumen HAM internasional menimbulkan praktik pelanggaran HAM dan melemahkan proses deradikalisasi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan rekonstruksi hukum yang menyeluruh guna menciptakan keseimbangan antara keamanan nasional dan keadilan hukum yang menjunjung tinggi hak asasi manusia.
Co-Authors Ade Saptomo Megawati Barthosr Zainal Arifin Hoesein