Putri, Audrey Rasya Novianto
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Kasus Pencucian Uang Rafael Alun Trisambodo dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara Suryo, Angger Bagas; Putri, Audrey Rasya Novianto; Rahmadhana, Radya Alluna; Andi Fitra, Taufiqur Rahman; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 4 (2024): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

State administrative law is a branch of law that regulates the relationship between the government and the public, and regulates the mechanism for administrative decision-making by public officials. In this context, accountability and transparency are basic principles that must be upheld by government officials to maintain public trust. The case of Rafael Alun Trisambodo, an official at the Indonesian Ministry of Finance who was involved in alleged money laundering, has become a spotlight that highlights the challenges and dynamics in enforcing state administrative law. This study aims to explore the implications of state administrative law resulting from the case, with a focus on the role of regulation in preventing acts of corruption, as well as the importance of public oversight and participation. The methodology used is a qualitative analysis of legal documents, related policies, and media reports. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of stricter policies and proactive oversight are essential to strengthen public integrity and prevent the practice of abuse of power. These findings are expected to provide recommendations for the development of more effective state administrative law, as well as support the government's efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia.
Analisis Yuridis Pemutusan Sepihak dalam Kasus Perjanjian Kerja Sama Pengelolaan dan Pemanfaatan Limbah B3 oleh PT Chuhatsu Indonesia terhadap PT Tenang Jaya Sejahtera Zulfariza, Alya Annisa; Pakpahan, Firly Natasha; Rahman, Naziva Azahra; Putri, Audrey Rasya Novianto; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15493173

Abstract

Unilateral termination of agreements is often encountered, where one party unilaterally terminates an agreement that was initially made based on mutual consent. This situation is similar to the case involving PT. Chuhatsu Indonesia and PT. Sejahtera. In addressing this case, the Supreme Court (MA) opined that if one party that has entered into an agreement with another party unilaterally terminates the agreement, the terminating party is deemed to have committed an unlawful act (PMH). The Supreme Court's (MA) opinion is stated in Decision Number 1051 K/Pdt/2014 (PT. Chuhatsu Indonesia vs. PT. Tenang Jaya Sejahtera), dated November 12, 2014. According to the Supreme Court (MA), unilateral termination of an agreement violates Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and the legal stance it has explained, where the Supreme Court views unilateral termination of an agreement as an unlawful act, which has become a permanent jurisprudence in the Supreme Court. This is because the Supreme Court has consistently applied this legal stance in all rulings involving similar issues since 2014. To further identify this matter, using a juridical method with a legislative approach, the author focuses on analyzing the legal implications of the termination of the agreement by PT. Chuhatsu Indonesia against PT. Tenang Jaya Sejahtera on November 12, 2014.
Pelanggaran Ham Dalam Tragedi Kanjuruhan 2022: Perspektif Keadilan dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Agustin, Elinda Azis Tri; Mumtaz, Khansa Khairunnisa; Mapandiy, Vivian Daniella; Zulfariza, Alya Annisa; Pakpahan, Firly Natasha; Rahman, Naziva Azzahra; Putri, Audrey Rasya Novianto; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Human rights (HAM) guarantee protection and justice for every individual, including in organizing sporting events. Although regulated in national and international regulations, human rights violations still often occur, especially in excessive crowd control. The Kanjuruhan tragedy on October 1, 2022 is clear evidence of this negligence. The incident caused 135 fatalities and hundreds more were injured due to mass panic triggered by the use of tear gas in the stadium. This incident highlighted the weakness of the security system and the lack of protection for supporters. The actions of the authorities in the Kanjuruhan tragedy were considered excessive and violated FIFA regulations, especially the use of tear gas which actually worsened the situation. In response, the government formed an Independent Joint Fact-Finding Team (TGIPF) to investigate this incident and take action against those responsible. However, many consider that the verdict against the defendant does not reflect justice for the victims and their families. This tragedy is a bitter reminder of the weakness of security in stadiums, encouraging reform and improvement of regulations for the safety of spectators. This study emphasizes the importance of a more humane security policy, where security is not only effective but also respects human rights. Comprehensive reform and strong commitment to human rights protection are important steps to prevent similar incidents from happening again in the future.