Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Rahmadhana, Radya Alluna
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Kasus Pencucian Uang Rafael Alun Trisambodo dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara Suryo, Angger Bagas; Putri, Audrey Rasya Novianto; Rahmadhana, Radya Alluna; Andi Fitra, Taufiqur Rahman; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 4 (2024): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

State administrative law is a branch of law that regulates the relationship between the government and the public, and regulates the mechanism for administrative decision-making by public officials. In this context, accountability and transparency are basic principles that must be upheld by government officials to maintain public trust. The case of Rafael Alun Trisambodo, an official at the Indonesian Ministry of Finance who was involved in alleged money laundering, has become a spotlight that highlights the challenges and dynamics in enforcing state administrative law. This study aims to explore the implications of state administrative law resulting from the case, with a focus on the role of regulation in preventing acts of corruption, as well as the importance of public oversight and participation. The methodology used is a qualitative analysis of legal documents, related policies, and media reports. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of stricter policies and proactive oversight are essential to strengthen public integrity and prevent the practice of abuse of power. These findings are expected to provide recommendations for the development of more effective state administrative law, as well as support the government's efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia.
Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional oleh ICJ: Studi Kasus Nigeria-Kamerun Rahmadhana, Radya Alluna
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The territorial dispute over Bakassi between Nigeria and Cameroon is a significant example of international dispute resolution through the International Court of Justice (ICJ). This article examines the effectiveness of the ICJ in resolving the maritime dispute between the two countries, highlighting the legal process from the case submission in 1994 to the implementation of the ruling in 2002, which resulted in the transfer of the Bakassi Peninsula to Cameroon. The study analyzes the stages of legal resolution, challenges during implementation, and the socio-political impact of the ICJ’s decision on both nations. The findings indicate that the ICJ mechanism is effective in providing a legally binding peaceful solution, although successful implementation heavily depends on the political commitment and continued diplomacy of the involved states. This case study underscores the crucial role of the International Court of Justice in upholding international law and serves as a reference for resolving similar disputes in the future
Co-Authors Andi Fitra, Taufiqur Rahman Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Putri, Audrey Rasya Novianto Suryo, Angger Bagas