Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Asian Journal of Public Health and Nursing
Vinnakota, Divya
Unknown Affiliation
Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Exploring the Factors Responsible for Gun and Knife Violence Among the Young Generation in the UK: A Scoping Review White, Marie; Vinnakota, Divya; Hussain, Remsha; Sivasubramanian, Madhini
Asian Journal of Public Health and Nursing Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Queeva Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62377/2pb9vt60

Abstract

Background: Youth violence is the fourth leading cause of death among individuals aged 10-29, representing a significant global public health concern. In the UK, gun and knife crimes among youth are particularly troubling. This scoping review aims to identify the contributing factors of gun and knife violence among young people in the UK and their impact on mental health. Method: We searched literature using Medline, PubMed Central, Sunderland Library, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and approved government websites. Boolean operators were used with specific search terms, including only full-text, English-language, and original research publications. The PRISMA flowchart was used to document the selection process. Result: Out of 648 identified articles, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Three primary themes emerged: socio-economic factors, gang involvement, and mental health. Conclusion: Gun and knife violence among young people in the UK poses a significant public health burden. Effective interventions require addressing socio-economic disparities, preventing gang involvement, and providing accessible mental health support.
Mastering the Art of Scoping Reviews: A Comprehensive Guide for Public Health and Allied Health Students Kabir, Russell; Parsa, Ali Davod; Syed, Haniya Zehra; Bai, Ancy Chandrababu Mercy; Hussain, Remsha; Khan, Muhammad Feroz; Parvin, Sauda; Vinnakota, Divya; Sathian, Brijesh; Sivasubramanian, Madhini; Banerjee, Indrajit; Chowdhury, Mohammad Rocky Khan; Mohammadnezhad, Masoud; Arafat, S.M Yasir; Aaqib, Muhammad; Marthoenis, M; Husain, Syed Shajee; Hayhoe, Richard
Asian Journal of Public Health and Nursing Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Queeva Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62377/j544ed47

Abstract

Background: Scoping reviews systematically map the breadth of evidence on a particular topic, providing a comprehensive overview of the available research. This paper aims to outline the key steps involved in conducting a scoping review and to provide practical guidance for public health and allied health students and researchers. Methods: Formulating a research question using the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework to develop a clear research question or objective. Setting inclusion and exclusion criteria to guide the selection of studies for inclusion in the review. Conducting a thorough search across relevant databases and sources, including both academic and grey literature. Using a PRISMA flow diagram to document the search and selection process. Extracting and charting relevant data from included studies. Analysing synthesizing data using descriptive analysis or basic qualitative content analysis. Summarizing and presenting findings in a clear and meaningful way. Results: The paper provides a detailed guide for conducting scoping reviews, emphasizing the differences between scoping reviews and systematic reviews. It highlights that scoping reviews address broader research questions and typically do not assess study quality. Practical guidance is provided on developing search strategies and creating data extraction forms. Conclusions: This paper serves as a comprehensive guide for public health and allied health students and researchers undertaking scoping reviews, covering key methodological considerations and best practices throughout the review process.
Co-Authors Aaqib, Muhammad Arafat, S.M Yasir Bai, Ancy Chandrababu Mercy Banerjee, Indrajit Chowdhury, Mohammad Rocky Khan Hayhoe, Richard Husain, Syed Shajee Hussain, Remsha Kabir, Russell Khan, Muhammad Feroz M. Marthoenis Mohammadnezhad, Masoud Parsa, Ali Davod Parvin, Sauda Sathian, Brijesh Sivasubramanian, Madhini Syed, Haniya Zehra White, Marie