Ni Putu Adhya Pradnyaswari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of Legal Protection for Consumers in Trading Through Electronic Systems Based on Minister of Trade Regulation Number 31 of 2023 I Made Rai Buda Tantra Yoga Suarsawan; I Nyoman Prabu Buana Rumiartha; Ni Putu Adhya Pradnyaswari
Focus Journal : Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2024): Focus Journal Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2
Publisher : Universitas Bali Dwipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62795/fjl.v4i2.278

Abstract

Trading Through Electronic Systems (PMSE) is a type of trading that is different from conventional trading because it uses an electronic systems. With the rapid advancement of technology, PMSE continues to grow with the emergence of various types of electronic trading. The purpose of this research is to analyze the types of trading through electronic systems and the legal protection provided to consumers engaging in PMSE based on Minister of Trade Regulation Number 31 of 2023. The method used in this research is normative legal research. Normative research involves a literature review with a statutory approach. The results of this study identify various types of PMSE according to Minister of Trade Regulation Number 31 of 2023, as well as several forms of legal protection for consumers participating in PMSE. However, the legal protection offered under this regulation still refers to the Consumer Protection Act. This aspect requires updating, considering the diverse types and forms of PMSE that have emerged.
Australian & Indonesian Regulations: Preventive and Repressive Law Enforcement of Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce Ni Putu Adhya Pradnyaswari
Focus Journal : Law Review Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Focus Journal Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 Mei 2026
Publisher : Universitas Bali Dwipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62795/fjl.v6i1.442

Abstract

Preventive and repressive consumer protection law enforcement is implemented in Australia and Indonesia. Regulations related to legal protection for consumers in electronic transactions or e-commerce in Australia and Indonesia share significant similarities, with the same principled goal of providing legal protection. However, in Australia, this is regulated by the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), which is part of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. In Indonesia, consumer protection is regulated by Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK), despite the differences in the legal systems of Australia and Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to analyze and examine the legal comparison between regulations related to legal protection for consumers in electronic transactions or e-commerce in Australia and Indonesia, focusing on the nature of preventive and repressive law enforcement. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method using a comparative legal approach. The results of the study show that consumer protection laws in Australia and Indonesia, namely in Australia using a single national regulation that regulates consumer protection and business competition in an integrated manner, so that it is more efficient and coordinated, while in Indonesia the regulations are scattered across various regulations that often overlap with many regulations, causing weak effectiveness of supervision and implementation of consumer protection in the e-commerce sector. Furthermore, there are similarities, namely prohibiting misleading practices including fraud and guaranteeing consumer rights, as well as emphasizing that business actors are obliged to be responsible if there is a loss to consumers.