Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

One map policy as an anti-corruption endeavour in the Indonesian mining sector Virgy, Muhammad Arief; Mustofa, Mustabsyirotul Ummah; Mikail, Ahmad
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v10i2.1312

Abstract

Indonesia plays an important role in the global mining industry, particularly in coal and nickel. Ensuring that mining resources support the people's livelihoods, as mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, requires good governance in the mining sector. However, corruption remains a significant challenge. This research identifies the types of corruption present in the mining sector and proposes solutions. Using qualitative methods and collecting secondary data sources such as news reports and other accessible documents, the study reveals that corruption mostly occurs in the issuance of mining permits, often due to overlapping areas between mining permits and other land uses. In order to address these issues and strengthen governance, the One Map Policy has been proposed. This policy aims to improve spatial planning quality, reduce overlaps between mining concessions and Indigenous peoples’ areas, and prevent concessions in protected forests. However, the policy faces challenges due to a lack of transparency in making map data publicly accessible, which hinders external inputs. Additionally, there is no government body responsible for verifying independent map data from external sources. Enhancing transparency and involving external parties in providing input to the One Map Policy can promote accountability, ensuring mining activities adhere to good governance principles and protect local communities and Indigenous peoples’ rights as well as their livelihoods.
CLIENTELISM AND THE QUALITY OF DEMOCRACY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RULE OF LAW AND PUBLIC GOODS PROVISION IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA Mikail, Ahmad; Virgy, Muhammad Arief; Mustofa, Mustabsyirotul Ummah
JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Vol 11, No 2 (2026): JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) May
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/jwp.v11i2.70833

Abstract

Clientelism remains common in Southeast Asian politics even though electoral democracy has expanded. This study examines how different forms of clientelism influence democratic quality, focusing on the rule of law and public goods provision in Indonesia and Malaysia. Building on the theories of clientelism, understood as the exchange of material benefits for political support. Such practices can weaken the fair enforcement of laws and shift public spending toward targeted groups instead of universal welfare programs. This study uses panel data from the Varieties of Democracy Institute and applies a comparative approach to analyze Indonesia and Malaysia. A multiple linear regression model is used to examine whether higher levels of clientelism are associated with weaker rule of law and lower levels of universal public-goods provision. The results show that higher levels of clientelism are linked to weaker rules of law and lower public-goods provision in both countries. However, the effects appear in different ways. In Indonesia, fragmented and candidate-centered clientelism organized through temporary broker networks is more strongly connected to the erosion of legal enforcement. In Malaysia, centralized and party-based clientelism under the United Malays National Organisation–Barisan Nasional system mainly affects the fairness and universality of welfare distribution.