Muhammad, Hanifah Salma
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Sociological Analysis of Islamic Law on The Implementation of the Jo Kawin Bocah Program in Reducing Early Marriage Rates (Case Study on the PKK Team of Temanggung Regency) Rahmadani, Luqiya Suci; Ibrahim, Malik; Muhammad, Hanifah Salma
Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Komparatif Volume 3 Issue 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/el-aqwal.v3i2.12596

Abstract

The "Jo Kawin Bocah" program aims to prevent early marriages in Central Java, particularly in Temanggung Regency, where 414 cases were recorded in 2022. Implemented by the PKK Movement Team, the program focuses on educating communities to reduce early marriage rates. This research analyzes its implementation in Temanggung Regency in 2023 using a sociological approach to Islamic law and descriptive analysis. The findings reveal two main points. First, the PKK Movement Team enhances the program through collaboration with the government, communities, institutions like GenRe (Planned Generation), and mass media for effective dissemination. Second, based on Atho' Mudzhar's sociological theory of Islamic law, factors such as religious practices, social structures, interactions, and support from community organizations significantly influence the program's outcomes. By fostering awareness and community involvement, the program has successfully shifted perceptions and reduced early marriage practices in Temanggung, demonstrating its potential as a model for other regions.
Kompetensi Pengadilan Agama dalam Menangani Perkara Warisan Beda Agama (Analisis Perkara 1854/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Plg) Muhammad, Hanifah Salma; Ibrahim, Malik
MAHAKIM Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 7 No 1 (2023): January 2023
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/mahakim.v7i1.184

Abstract

This article discusses the competence of religious courts in adjudicating disputes over interfaith inheritance between Muslims and non-Muslims. This can happen inseparably from the social and cultural conditions of people in Indonesia who are pluralism with various backgrounds such as ethnicity, customs, different languages, and belief or religious factors. But on the other hand, there are differences in views between the fuqaha regarding the heritage of different religions. If the heir and heir, both the heir as the plaintiff and the defendant, have differences in religion, then the practice of law enforcement in the court against the inheritance case creates a dispute over competence between the religious court and the district court. This study examines through legislation, legal literature in accordance with the research being discussed and uses Islamic law to answer the author's problem formulation by analyzing decision number 1854 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PA.Plg. The results of the research that can be concluded are that when viewed from a juridical point of view, religious courts are authorized to adjudicate cases of disputes over inheritance between religions. This can happen because it is based on jurisprudence 51K/AG/1999. The function of jurisprudence can be used as the best way given by judges to communities that have family pluralism as a solution in resolving cases of inheritance disputes between religions. However, when viewed from the normative side of Islamic law, religious courts are authorized to adjudicate inheritance disputes with parties of different religions. This can happen because it is based on the interpretation of Yusuf Al-Qardawi and the ijtihad of the supreme court for a sense of justice for families whose pluralism of beliefs. The inheritance is not counted as heirs but is counted as a mandatory will of no more than 1/3 part.
TINJAUAN SOSIOLOGI HUKUM TERHADAP FAKTOR KEGAGALAN MEDIATOR DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERCERAIAN: STUDI KASUS PENGADILAN AGAMA CIAMIS TAHUN 2022 Muhammad, Hanifah Salma; Putra, Mochamad Dhimas Danindra; Ibrahim, Malik
Al-IHKAM Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Jurusan Ahwal al-Syakhshiyyah Fakultas Syariah IAIN Mataram Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024): Juni 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Mediasi merupakan salah satu cara hakim dan mediator dalam proses pengoptimalan usaha perdamaian bagi para pihak yang berperkara dan dapat meminimalisir perkara yang diajukan di Pengadilan. Hal ini dilakukan sebagai salah satu sebagai inovasi dalam mempercepat beracara di Pengadilan yang dilakukan secara sederhana, cepat, dan biaya ringan. Adapun mekanisme pelaksanaan mediasi perkara perceraian oleh mediator hakim berdasarkan PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini akan melakukan studi kasus di Pengadilan Agama Ciamis untuk melihat efektifitas hakim dan mediator dalam mengurai penumpukan perkara dan meningkatkan keberhasilan mediasi di Pengadilan yang saat ini masih rendahnya tingkat keberhasilan mediasi perceraian. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan field research di Pengadilan Agama Ciamis, melalui sifat penelitian dekriptif-analitis, dan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis. Adapun teori dalam menemukan jawaban dalam rumusan masalah yaitu menggunakan teori sosiologi hukum dan efektivitas hukum, kemudian juga melihat dari sisi mediasi secara peraturan yang ada serta kewenangan dari mediator. Dimana dengan menggunakan metode penelitian dan teori penelitian tersebut. maka mekanisme pelaksanaan mediasi dapat diselidiki atas kesesuaian hukum dan efektivitas peranan mediator hakim melalui pengamatan langsung. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan, maka dapat diketahui bahwa kompetensi mediator hakim dalam memediasi, terdapat hambatan yang menjadikan faktor kegagalan hakim secara sosiologis. Rendahnya keberhasilan mediasi, akibat terbatasnya mediator hakim dan kompetensi mediator. Secara sosiologi, efektivitas PERMA No.1 Tahun 2016 tidak dapat menuntut para pihak beritikad baik dalam mediasi.