Santoso, Rizki Andi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pergeseran Wewenang Perum Perhutani KPH Malang Dalam Pengelolaan Cagar Budaya (Studi Kasus: Candi Sumberawan, Singosari) Santoso, Rizki Andi; Siatiman, Reinhard Valent; Amirulazka, Naufal Itsnain; Mustaqim, Muhammad Azhar Shiroth
Equality : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Hukum Artificial Intelligence
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/equality-jlj.v1i2.133

Abstract

Sumberawan Temple is one of the cultural heritages in Malang Regency. Located in the middle of a pine forest, the temple is managed by Perum Perhutani KPH Malang. As a cultural heritage, the temple should be managed by the Malang Regency Tourism and Culture Office. However, the status quo shows otherwise, there is an overlap of authority between Perum Perhutani KPH Malang and Disparbud Malang District. The regulation of cultural heritage management in Malang Regency has been regulated in Regent Regulation No. 49/2016 on the Position, Structure, Organization, Duties and Functions, and Work Procedures of the Malang Regency Tourism and Culture Office. The regulation stipulates the authority of the Malang District Tourism and Culture Office to carry out the function of cultural heritage management. The purpose of this study is to determine the authority of Perum Perhutani KPH Malang, the Tourism and Culture Office of Malang Regency, and to compare the authority of the two institutions in managing cultural heritage, as well as to analyze the shift in the function of Perum Perhutani KPH Malang through the regulation a quo. The research method used is normative juridical with analytical materials in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Primary legal materials used are regulations governing the authority to manage cultural heritage. Then, secondary legal materials used are books, journals, articles, previous research results, and expert opinions. The results showed that there is a conflict of functions and authorities in the management of Sumberawan Temple. The conflict is shown by the management of Sumberawan Temple by Perum Perhutani KPH Malang which juridically has no authority.  Therefore, it is necessary to harmonize regulations related to authority in the management of Sumberawan Temple between Perum Perhutani KPH Malang and Malang Regency Tourism and Culture Office.
Problematika Mahkamah Kehormatan Dewan Dalam Penegakan Etika Parlemen (Studi Komparatif Lembaga Etik Di Indonesia) Santoso, Rizki Andi; Itsnain Amirulazka, Naufal; Valent Siatiman, Reinhard; Rayyana Firdaus, Naira; Karyadi, Frederica
Equality : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 3 No 1 (2026): Penguatan Prinsip Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hak dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesi
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/equality-jlj.v3i1.629

Abstract

The Council of Honor (MKD) as the institution that enforces the code of ethics for members of the House of Representatives is a crucial instrument in maintaining the dignity and integrity of the Indonesian parliament. Normatively, the MKD is regulated in Law Number 17 of 2014 concerning MD3, but the membership design, which is entirely derived from DPR factions, creates a high potential for conflict of interest, making the ethical enforcement process susceptible to internal political interests. In addition, the provisions of Article 132 paragraph (1) of the MD3 Law, which stipulates that MKD hearings are closed, have created an inconsistency with Article 5 paragraph (2) of DPR Regulation No. 1 of 2015 concerning the Code of Ethics, which emphasizes that members of the DPR must be willing to be monitored by the public. This study aims to examine the structural and normative weaknesses of the MKD in enforcing the ethics of DPR members. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative approach by comparing the MKD with other ethical institutions such as the DKPP, the Honorary Council of Judges, and the Honorary Council of Notaries. The results of the analysis show that the MKD as an ethical institution is still vulnerable to political intervention and conflicts of interest due to its membership structure and normative regulations related to the conduct of hearings that are contradictory. In addition, the suboptimal imposition and execution of decisions have resulted in weak public trust in the MKD. Thus, it is necessary to reformulate regulations related to the MKD through open hearings, restructuring membership based on independent elements, and strengthening the execution of decisions without dependence on political decisions made in plenary sessions.