Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.829
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Proceedings of the 1st UR International Conference on Educational Sciences Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN KEADILAN JURNAL PILAR KEADILAN Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Krakatau (Indonesian of Multidiciplinary Journal) (Indonesian of Interdisciplinary Journal) Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan
Sri Novita, Maya
Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Banten, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Ethics of Election Organizers in the Implementation of Simultaneous Regional Elections in 2024 Dewi, Lia Riesta; Novita, Maya Sri
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Rule of Law: Legal Certainty, Policy, and Governance
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v5i2.29343

Abstract

This study focuses on looking at the dynamics and constellation of the ethics of the Election Commissions in organizing the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Elections. This paper aims to gain an understanding of two things. First, the implementation of ethics institutionalization and enforcement of election ethics. Second, the dynamics of the development of the ethics of election organizers in the implementation of the 2024 simultaneous regional elections. The paper is prepared based on normative legal research based on secondary data. The results of the study found that: first, the ethics of the Election Organizer are enforced with a tiered source of national ethics starting from Pancasila as philosofische grondslag to DKPP Regulations related to the Election Organizer's Code of Ethics. Second, the integrity and professionalism of the election can be realized if the Election Organizer in interpreting the code of ethics is guided by the principles of the Election Organizer's code of ethics.
Jurisdictional Ambiguity over Corruption Crimes Committed by Military Personnel under Indonesia’s New Criminal Law Framework Agustinus Purnomo Hadi; Prastopo Prastopo; Maya Sri Novita; Ridwan Ridwan
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 10, No 1 (2026): International Journal on Language, Research (Law) Education Studies
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v10i1.29436

Abstract

The enactment of Indonesia’s National Criminal Code raises a new legal issue concerning the jurisdictional position of corruption crimes committed by military personnel. The problem lies in determining whether the competent court should be based on the offender’s military status or on the special nature of corruption crimes, which involve state financial losses, abuse of public authority, institutional integrity, and public trust. This study uses normative juridical research with statutory, conceptual, and institutional approaches. The analysis examines the relationship between the National Criminal Code, anti-corruption legislation, military justice law, and selected court decisions involving corruption crimes committed by military personnel. The study finds that judicial practice still relies on military courts and connected-case mechanisms in handling such cases. However, these mechanisms have not fully resolved the ambiguity between offender-status-based jurisdiction and offense-based jurisdiction. This article argues that jurisdiction should be determined through a functional approach by considering the offender’s status, the nature of the offense, the object of loss, the lex specialis principle, public accountability, and the institutional purpose of anti-corruption adjudication. Military courts should remain relevant for offenses directly related to military discipline and command, while corruption crimes that harm state finances and public integrity should retain their special character within the national criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Agustinus Purnomo Hadi Dewi, Lia Riesta M. Rahmad MARTINESYA, SEFA Muhammad Syafi’i Prastopo Prastopo Ridwan Ridwan Syafi’i, Muhammad