Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture
Alias, Nizamuddin
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Authority Analysis of Non-Legal Entity Organization and Opportunities for Dispute Resolution Through Litigation Sufiarina, Sufiarina; Alias, Nizamuddin; Sopyan, Yayan; Enijaya, Enijaya
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.3.2024.635-662

Abstract

Article 28 of the Indonesian Constitution is formulated to guarantee the freedom of associations and assembly, including the formation of community organizations (ormas). Ormas holding legal entity status are accommodated under associations, while non-legal entity ormas can still register but do not have the same status. The distinction between ormas and associations lies in their legal recognition. Associations possess legal entity status, while ormas are considered non-legal entities. According to Article 20 of Law No. 17 of 2013, ormas have the right to cooperate with other entities to develop and sustain their organizations. However, such cooperation may give rise to conflict, which cannot always be avoided. This raises important questions, such as "Do ormas administrators possess full authority to undertake all legal actions?" and "What avenues are available for ormas to resolve disputes through litigation?" To address these questions, doctrinal research is conducted using both legislative and conceptual methods. The results shows that the authority of ormas administrators is strictly limited by legal provisions. Since ormas lacks  the legal standing required of legal entity, they  are are unable to resolve conflicts through litigation. In light of such challenges, it is recommended that ormas registration system include a comprehensive list of members authorized to act on behalf of the organizations in civil actions with third parties. This measure would enable ormas to explore non-litigation channels for resolving civil disputes, offering a practical alternative to formal court proceedings.
The Authority Analysis of Non-Legal Entity Organization and Opportunities for Dispute Resolution Through Litigation Sufiarina, Sufiarina; Alias, Nizamuddin; Sopyan, Yayan; Enijaya, Enijaya
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.3.2024.635-662

Abstract

Article 28 of the Indonesian Constitution is formulated to guarantee the freedom of associations and assembly, including the formation of community organizations (ormas). Ormas holding legal entity status are accommodated under associations, while non-legal entity ormas can still register but do not have the same status. The distinction between ormas and associations lies in their legal recognition. Associations possess legal entity status, while ormas are considered non-legal entities. According to Article 20 of Law No. 17 of 2013, ormas have the right to cooperate with other entities to develop and sustain their organizations. However, such cooperation may give rise to conflict, which cannot always be avoided. This raises important questions, such as "Do ormas administrators possess full authority to undertake all legal actions?" and "What avenues are available for ormas to resolve disputes through litigation?" To address these questions, doctrinal research is conducted using both legislative and conceptual methods. The results shows that the authority of ormas administrators is strictly limited by legal provisions. Since ormas lacks  the legal standing required of legal entity, they  are are unable to resolve conflicts through litigation. In light of such challenges, it is recommended that ormas registration system include a comprehensive list of members authorized to act on behalf of the organizations in civil actions with third parties. This measure would enable ormas to explore non-litigation channels for resolving civil disputes, offering a practical alternative to formal court proceedings.
Tracer Study and User Satisfaction for Alumni of the Sociology and Anthropology Education Study Program of the FISIP UNNES, Indonesia Husain, Fadly; Wijaya, Atika; Wicaksono, Harto; Fatimah, Nurul; Fauzi, Malik Ridwan; Alias, Nizamuddin
Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024): March 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v16i1.2936

Abstract

Throughout its journey as an educational forum, the sociology and anthropology education deparment of Universitas Negeri Semarang has graduated 18 batches. The existence of graduates and access to a job must be known by the institution where graduates take their education because the output provided by graduates is a very important indicator of knowing the quality of education organized by the Sociology and Anthropology Education Deparment. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the absorption of the work field of graduates of the Sociology and Anthropology Education Deparment in 2020-2022, (2) to determine the level of satisfaction of alum users with the performance of graduates of the Sociology and Anthropology Education Deparment in 2020-2022. This research was conducted using a quantitative descriptive approach and cluster sampling technique in sampling. Data was collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results of the tracer study provide an overview of the 168 alums. 51% of graduates work in education, while as many as 49% work in the non-educational sector, such as entrepreneurs and the government sector. Users of graduates (stakeholders) assessed alum performance with good and very good criteria, especially in the categories of ethics, main competencies, proficiency in the use of information technology, communication, teamwork, and personal development. As many as 21% of the graduates chose to continue their studies. The input submitted was obtained from the existing findings: quality in doing social research, improving foreign language skills, and increasing learning related to religion. This input is given as input for efforts to improve the quality of the next Sociology and Anthropology Education Deparment graduates.
Co-Authors Atika Wijaya Enijaya, Enijaya Fadly Husain Fauzi, Malik Ridwan Harto Wicaksono, Harto James Yoseph Palenewen Nurul Fatimah Sufiarina Yayan Sopyan