Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Legal Protection of Consumers with Online Transactions Suwardi; Rossa Ilma Silfiah; Humiati; Kristina Sulatri; Yudhia Ismail
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (September-October 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i6.810

Abstract

With the existence of a new legal regime known as cyber law or telematics law, the transaction system makes it easier for users. Cyber law or cyber law is used by utilizing information and communication technology which is a manifestation of the convergence of telecommunications law, media law and information law. The legal problems that are often faced are related to information, communication and/or transactions, especially in terms of evidence related to legal actions carried out by electronic systems. This writing aims to provide legal protection for consumers with online transactions. The research method used is normative juridical research, which involves analysis of theories, concepts, legal principles and statutory regulations relevant to this research topic. The legal problems that are often faced are related to the delivery of information, communi cation and/or transactions electronically, especially in terms of evidence and matters related to legal actions carried out through electronic systems. The results of this research can be concluded: First, in the form of legal protection for consumers who make online transactions as regulated in Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions as well as provisions for legal protection for consumer users with online transactions or e-commerce. Second, in the form of responsibility for parties involved in online transactions or e-commerce as stated in Law Number Article 12 paragraph 3 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, it is explained that every person who violates the obligation to carry out electronic transactions must be responsible for all losses and the resulting legal consequences.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Perbuatan Memudahkan Persetubuhan Sebagai Mata Pencaharian Fransisca Ruth Agustin Runtuwene; Yudhia Ismail; Dwi Budiarti
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli : Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v3i3.1970

Abstract

This study examines the legal regulation of facilitating sexual intercourse as a livelihood under Article 421 of the Indonesian Criminal Code and the legal objectives of increasing the applicable punishment by one-third. This study employed normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials comprised primary sources, including the Indonesian Criminal Code, Human Rights Law, and Child Protection Law, as well as secondary sources consisting of books, journal articles, and relevant legal literature. The materials were qualitatively examined using descriptive-analytical methods. The results demonstrate that Article 421 does not constitute an independent criminal offense but serves as a sentencing aggravation for offenses under Articles 419 and 420 when committed habitually or for profit as a livelihood. This aggravation reflects the offender’s greater culpability and the broader social harm caused by the continuous commercialization of sexual exploitation. It seeks to promote justice, legal certainty, and utility while preventing organized sexual exploitation and protecting human dignity and children’s interests. Nevertheless, the undefined standard of habitual conduct and the expansion of prostitution through digital platforms require careful interpretation to maintain effective enforcement without undermining legality and legal certainty.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PENUMPANG JASA ANGKUT ORANG DENGAN KENDARAAN BERMOTOR UMUM NON-TRAYEK M. Fiqih Saputra Saputra; Yudhia Ismail; Wiwin Ariesta
Yurijaya : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): AGUSTUS
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Pasuruan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51213/yurijaya.v8i2.274

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara komprehensif bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi penumpang jasa angkut orang dengan kendaraan bermotor umum non-trayek berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan serta Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Selain itu, penelitian ini mengkaji dan membedah bentuk serta mekanisme pertanggungjawaban hukum yang dapat dibebankan kepada penyedia jasa angkut atas risiko kerugian material maupun immaterial yang dialami penumpang dengan mengintegrasikan telaah literatur dari artikel-artikel penelitian terdahulu. Perkembangan pesat moda transportasi non-trayek, terutama yang bertransformasi ke arah digital melalui fasilitas perusahaan aplikator, memicu kompleksitas hubungan hukum keperdataan yang asimetris. Metode penelitian yang diterapkan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian normatif yuridis dengan memanfaatkan pendekatan rugulasi dan pendekatan konseptual. Data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui penelitian pustaka dianalisis dengan pendekatan kualitatif menggunakan penalaran deduktif. Temuan penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa perlindungan hukum secara preventif bagi penumpang belum diimplementasikan secara maksimal, disebabkan oleh banyaknya penggunaan klausul eksonerasi sepihak dalam kontrak standar elektronik yang merugikan hak konsumen dalam hal kompensasi. Dalam konteks represif, tanggung jawab hukum bagi penyedia layanan angkutan non-trayek didasarkan pada prinsip tanggung jawab yang menganggap bersalah hingga terbukti tidak bersalah serta tanggung jawab tanpa syarat.. Namun, dalam tataran implementasi, posisi tawar konsumen yang lemah serta ambiguitas status hukum perusahaan aplikator sebagai penyedia teknologi telemastika sering kali menghambat pemenuhan hak restitusi penumpang saat terjadi kerugian atau kecelakaan.