Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Erham
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Hukum Implementasi Dana Desa di Desa Boro Kecamatan Sanggar Kabupaten Bima Ebi Irawan; Erham; Gufran
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 8 (2025): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i8.1626

Abstract

The Village Fund is a strategic instrument to promote the development and welfare of rural communities, as stipulated in Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. However, its implementation is often hampered by aspects of transparency, accountability, and community participation. This article examines the implementation of the Village Fund program in Boro Village, Sanggar District, Bima Regency, from a legal perspective using an empirical juridical approach. The results indicate that implementation is suboptimal due to weak apparatus capacity and minimal community participation. The principles of transparency and accountability have not been fully implemented. Regulatory strengthening, capacity building, and community oversight and participation are needed for the Village Fund to have a significant impact.
Harmonisasi Hukum atas Disparitas Putusan Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Walid Alfian; Erham; Amar Ma'arij
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 8 (2025): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i8.1721

Abstract

There is an overlapping authority between the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA) in reviewing laws and regulations. This is evident in the disparity between the Constitutional Court's decisions No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024 and No. 23P/HUM/2024 regarding the age limit for regional head candidates. The Constitutional Court uses the 1945 Constitution as a touchstone, while the Supreme Court uses the Law. This difference creates legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the Judicial Review authority of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court and formulate a harmonization strategy to avoid disparity in decisions. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach to examine the regulation and harmonization of Judicial Review in Indonesia. Harmonization efforts can refer to Law No. 13 of 2022, one of which is through the unification of normative review institutions.
Co-Authors Amar Ma'arij Ebi Irawan Gufran Walid Alfian