Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kosmik Hukum Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Jurnal Jurisprudence
Nikmah Fitriah
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Climate Justice: Challenges and Future Strategies for Courts on Climate Change in Indonesia Nikmah Fitriah; Indriati Amarini
Kosmik Hukum Vol 25, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i1.24776

Abstract

Climate change has become a global phenomenon characterized by an increase in the earth's average temperature, which is largely caused by human activities. The use of Litigation to resolve climate change issues has more than doubled since 2017 and is still growing. This research aims to explore the challenges and strategies in mainstreaming climate justice in Indonesia through climate change courts. With a doctrinal approach, this research will examine primary legal sources, such as legislation, jurisprudence, and international documents, as well as secondary sources, such as academic literature and organizational reports, to produce evidence-based recommendations for the development of a legal framework for climate justice in Indonesia. The research results show that climate change makes courts an important player in multi-level climate governance, therefore courts must have climate sensitivity and awareness. There is a need for specific material and procedural laws regarding climate and the need to develop the knowledge and skills of judges.
Integrated Legal Protection of Women in Conflict with the Law in the Criminal Judicial Process (Decision Case Number 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi) Amarini, Indriati; Nikmah Fitriah; Rizky Aulia Cahyadri
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1329

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: The state has an obligation to ensure that women obtain justice and are free from all discrimination in the criminal judicial process. Women in conflict with the law frequently feel uncomfortable when facing court proceedings in the position of suspect, victim, or witness. This paper analyzed legal considerations in the court decision of Bogor Cibinong District Court number 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi.  Methodology: This research employed the doctrinal legal analysis methodology. This study aimed to analyze the legal protection of women in conflict with the law in the courtroom. This investigation could be a regulating juridical consideration with philosophical and conceptual approaches.  Results: The result of the consideration appeared that the criminal equity handled in court was full of ethical issues. Recently, there was the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2017 concerning Rules on the Hearing of Cases Including Women in Conflict with the Law. The Decision of Bogor Cibinong District Court Number 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi managed a rapist of two children free from the charge of 14 years in prison for there is no witness who saw the rape. The integrated protection of women is required since they deal with the law during court proceedings and in the stages of inquiry, investigation, prosecution, and punishment.  Applications of this study: Regulation through legislation is required to protect women in conflict with the law in the criminal justice process.  Novelty/Originality of this study: In contrast to previous research, this research focused on studying how significant legal protection is for women in conflict with the law. Keywords: Legal Protection, Women, Litigation   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Negara memiliki kewajiban untuk memastikan perempuan memperoleh keadilan dan bebas dari segala diskriminasi dalam proses peradilan pidana. Perempuan yang berkonflik dengan hukum seringkali merasa tidak nyaman ketika menghadapi proses peradilan dalam posisi sebagai tersangka, korban, atau saksi. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bogor Cibinong nomor 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi.  Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi analisis hukum doktrinal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap perempuan yang berkonflik dengan hukum di ruang sidang. Investigasi tersebut menjadi pertimbangan yuridis dengan pendekatan filosofis dan konseptual.  Hasil: Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa peradilan pidana yang ditangani di pengadilan sarat dengan persoalan etik. Baru-baru ini, telah diterbitkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan dengan Hukum. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bogor Cibinong Nomor 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi membebaskan pemerkosa dua anak dari dakwaan 14 tahun penjara karena tidak ada saksi yang melihat pemerkosaan tersebut. Perlindungan terpadu terhadap perempuan diperlukan karena mereka berhadapan dengan hukum selama proses peradilan dan pada tahap penyelidikan, penyidikan, penuntutan, dan hukuman.  Aplikasi penelitian ini: Pengaturan melalui peraturan perundang-undangan diperlukan untuk melindungi perempuan yang berkonflik dengan hukum dalam proses peradilan pidana.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Berbeda dengan penelitian sebelumnya, penelitian ini berfokus untuk mengkaji seberapa signifikan perlindungan hukum bagi perempuan yang berkonflik dengan hukum.  Kata kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Perempuan, Litigasi
National Legislative Strategies for Strengthening Corporate Accountability for Environmental Damage and Social Justice in Industrial Pollution Satriya Nugraha; Retno Saraswasti; Nikmah Fitriah
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): December: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i4.272

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of national legislative strategies in promoting corporate accountability for industrial pollution and social justice violations. It analyzes a comparative legal framework, focusing on laws, enforcement mechanisms, and corporate liability regimes in countries such as France, Germany, Norway, China, and Australia. The research evaluates how mandatory due diligence laws, judicial measures, and transparency mechanisms help hold corporations accountable for environmental impacts. It compares voluntary compliance models with mandatory legal frameworks, noting the limitations of voluntary agreements in driving substantial environmental changes. Findings show that countries with strong legal frameworks, like the EU and Australia, achieve higher corporate compliance and environmental performance, while voluntary measures struggle to produce meaningful results. The study emphasizes the need for stronger enforcement, higher penalties for violations, and enhanced public transparency. Additionally, it explores integrating environmental justice considerations, such as community participation and fair compensation, into national strategies. The study offers policy recommendations for improving corporate responsibility through better legislation, harmonizing laws across jurisdictions, and fostering collaboration among governments, corporations, and civil society. It also suggests future research directions, including examining the long-term impacts of environmental justice policies in different global contexts.
Co-Authors Indriati Amarini Indriati Amarini Retno Saraswasti Rizky Aulia Cahyadri Satriya Nugraha