Indriati Amarini
Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Climate Justice: Challenges and Future Strategies for Courts on Climate Change in Indonesia Nikmah Fitriah; Indriati Amarini
Kosmik Hukum Vol 25, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i1.24776

Abstract

Climate change has become a global phenomenon characterized by an increase in the earth's average temperature, which is largely caused by human activities. The use of Litigation to resolve climate change issues has more than doubled since 2017 and is still growing. This research aims to explore the challenges and strategies in mainstreaming climate justice in Indonesia through climate change courts. With a doctrinal approach, this research will examine primary legal sources, such as legislation, jurisprudence, and international documents, as well as secondary sources, such as academic literature and organizational reports, to produce evidence-based recommendations for the development of a legal framework for climate justice in Indonesia. The research results show that climate change makes courts an important player in multi-level climate governance, therefore courts must have climate sensitivity and awareness. There is a need for specific material and procedural laws regarding climate and the need to develop the knowledge and skills of judges.
The Legal Position of Digital Forensic Experts in the Settlement of Information Technology Crime Cases Indriati Amarini; Rizky Aulia Cahyadri; Maulida Ayu Fitriani; Noorfajri Ismail
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2952

Abstract

Digital forensic expert testimony is required by judges to resolve cases related to information technology. However, there are allegations of violations committed by certain parties on several servers such as illegal access, configuration changes, and shutdowns. This is increased by the destruction of crime scene and digital evidence.  In some cases, analyzing the data collected can be time-consuming, and practical understanding is needed by judges to avoid irrelevant questions for digital forensic experts in court. Therefore, this research aims to determine and analyze forensic digital experts in court hearings, the duties and roles of judges in resolving information and technology cases as well as the position of forensic experts in the judicial process. The doctrinal research is sourced from secondary data in the form of Electronic Information and Transaction laws, criminal procedure laws, research reports, books, and scientific journals. The results show that digital forensics expert testimony is needed to assist judges as gatekeepers in obtaining material truth. Practical digital forensic knowledge is used to increase the efficiency of case examination time by avoiding irrelevant questions. Best practices are used in the actions, procedures, handling, and analysis of electronic evidence as well as digital forensic expert testimony in judicial practice.