Amar, Rezie Dava
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Peran Dan Kedudukan Korban Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 26 Tahun 2000 Tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia (Studi Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Berat Di Wamena 2003) Amar, Rezie Dava; Sinaga, Sesilia Faska Tiara Ernawati; Endiansyah, Jesicka Aurora; Destyana, Virgina; Priyana, Puti
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 10 No 24 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The problem that the author raises is the role of victims in cases of serious human rights violations in Wamena 2003, and what is the position and form of legal protection according to Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts. The research method used is normative juridical using secondary data and through statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The results and conclusions of this research are that the human rights problems in Wamena in 2003 were serious violations of human rights as regulated in Article 7 letter b and Article 9 of Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts. In the occurrence of human rights crimes in Wamena, the victim actually played a role, although the victim's role here is passive, the victim played a functional role in the occurrence of the crime. The position of victims and the form of legal protection for victims in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts is confirmed in Articles 34-35. In accordance with the provisions of Article 35 paragraph (3), the Government then issued Government Regulation Number 3 of 2002 concerning Compensation, Restitution and Rehabilitation for Victims of Serious Human Rights Violations.
Negosiasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia Amar, Rezie Dava; Apriani, Rani; Iman, Candra Hayatul
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 10 No 24 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One of the alternative dispute resolution methods that has long been known and is widely used in business disputes is negotiation. The problem that the author raises is how the negotiation process works in resolving business disputes and what are the advantages of resolving business disputes through negotiation. The research method used is normative juridical research using a statute approach. This research uses secondary data and the research was carried out by searching for information in the literature. The results and conclusions of this research are that the negotiation process in resolving business disputes involves a series of steps or stages from beginning to end, starting from the preparation stage, the negotiation stage and the final stage. Several forms of negotiation techniques that are generally known in society today include competitive, cooperative, soft, hard and interest-based negotiation techniques. The advantage of resolving business disputes through alternative dispute resolution, especially negotiation, is that the goal to be achieved is a win-win solution that is mutually beneficial to the disputing parties, without anyone feeling disadvantaged. Dispute resolution is simpler, the time is relatively fast, the costs are cheap and the confidentiality of the negotiating parties is also guaranteed because the dispute resolution does not involve a third party but the dispute is only resolved by the disputing parties.