Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil
Dewi, Rafama
Unknown Affiliation
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Tantangan Dan Pengelolaan Risiko Proyek Pembangunan Ibu Kota Nusantara Dengan Pendekatan Kualitatif: Analysis Of Challenges And Risk Management Of The Archipelago Capital City Development Project With A Qualitative Approach Dewi, Rafama; Soemardi, Biemo Woerjanto; Waty, Mega
Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil
Publisher : ​Institute for Researches and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/mits.v13i1.8660

Abstract

The Nusantara Capital City (IKN) development project is one of the strategic megaprojects in Indonesia with the aim of moving the center of government to East Kalimantan. The megaproject faces a number of significant challenges, including delays in physical progress, budget constraints, constraints in land acquisition, and complex technical risks. This study aims to analyze the challenges and risk mitigation strategies implemented in the IKN project through a qualitative approach based on progress reports until September 2024. With thematic analysis using the NVivo tool, three main themes in risk mitigation were found, namely flexible financial management, the use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology, and a cross-sector collaborative approach. The use of BIM has proven to be effective in detecting design clash detection, which reduces technical risks in the field. In addition, the involvement of local governments and local communities in the land acquisition process accelerates negotiations and reduces the potential for social conflict. The results of this study show that cross-sector collaboration, technology integration, and adaptive budget management play an important role in ensuring the smooth running of large-scale projects. This study is expected to contribute to the development of risk management strategies in Indonesian infrastructure projects.
Evaluasi Implementasi Program Berbasis Pemangku Kepentingan Di IKN: Pendekatan PLS-SEM Multigrup Di Seluruh Jenis Infrastruktur: Stakeholder-Based Evaluation Of Program Implementation In IKN: A Multigroup PLS-SEM Approach Across Infrastructure Types Dewi, Rafama; Soemardi, Biemo W.; Waty, Mega
Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil
Publisher : ​Institute for Researches and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The implementation of program management in megaprojects often encounters a gap between strategic planning and field execution. This study evaluates stakeholder perceptions regarding the effectiveness of program implementation and project performance in Indonesia’s Nusantara Capital City (IKN). A quantitative survey was conducted with 200 respondents divided into two infrastructure typologies: Horizontal (roads, area development, water resources) and Vertical (high-rise and low-rise buildings). A 6-point Likert scale questionnaire measured six variables: benefit tracking (X1), resource allocation (X2), coordination (X3), risk management (X4), program implementation (M1), and project performance (Y1). The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and multigroup analysis. In Horizontal projects, coordination emerged as the dominant factor (X3→M1 = 0.546; p = 0.000), with program implementation significantly affecting project performance (M1→Y1 = 0.413; p = 0.000). In Vertical projects, risk management was key (X4→M1 = 0.302; X4→Y1 = 0.412; p = 0.000). The strongest indirect effect was found in the coordination-to-performance path through program implementation (0.259; p = 0.000). R² values indicate strong predictive power for program implementation (Horizontal = 0.617; Vertical = 0.660) and project performance (Horizontal = 0.680; Vertical = 0.597). These findings highlight the importance of context-specific program governance strategies.
Co-Authors Biemo W. Soemardi, Biemo W. Mega Waty Soemardi, Biemo Woerjanto