Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Rijal Ibnu Sani
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Law Enforcement Against Illegal Investments Muhamad Javier Ramzy; Upik Mutiara; Ronald Samuel Wuisan; Rijal Ibnu Sani
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v8i2.5168

Abstract

nvestment is something that is growing rapidly in society. Apart from being easy, investing can also provide quite large profits. However, there is still a lot of illegal investment occurring in society. This is due to a lack of strict law enforcement and a lack of public education regarding investment. Therefore, it is necessary to educate the public and provide strict law enforcement to perpetrators of illegal investments so that people do not become victims in the future. Illegal investments usually offer large profits in a short time with low risk. Law enforcement against illegal investments can be carried out from two perspectives, namely civil and criminal. Investment is a rapidly growing trend within society, presenting an easy way to achieve substantial profits. Despite its potential benefits, there remains a significant presence of illegal investment activities. This issue primarily stems from insufficient law enforcement and a lack of public education about investment principles and risks. To mitigate this problem, it is crucial to enhance public awareness and implement stringent legal measures against those involved in illegal investments, ensuring that individuals are protected from becoming future victims. Typically, illegal investments promise high returns in a short period with minimal risk, attracting many unsuspecting individuals. Effective law enforcement against these fraudulent activities can be approached from both civil and criminal perspectives, addressing the issue comprehensively.
Pancasila Democracy Between Normative Concepts and Political Practice Cucu Supyan Cahyana; Ahmad Ahmad; Gamal Abdul Nasir; Franky Aryadi; Rijal Ibnu Sani
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/ijlp.v5i1.15884

Abstract

Pancasila Democracy constitutes Indonesia’s distinctive political system, rooted in the noble values of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. Normatively, Pancasila Democracy positions the people as the ultimate holders of sovereignty, implemented through moral principles, social justice, and deliberation to achieve consensus. However, in political practice, the implementation of Pancasila Democracy has frequently deviated from its foundational values. This article aims to analyze the gap between the normative concept of Pancasila Democracy and the realities of political practice in Indonesia across different periods, while also offering reflections and strategic measures to restore its original meaning. The study employs a library research method with a normative and descriptive-analytical approach. The findings indicate that Pancasila Democracy continues to face serious challenges, including the prevalence of transactional politics, weak political ethics, and low levels of morally grounded political participation. Therefore, revitalizing Pancasila values within national political life is an urgent necessity to achieve a democratic system that is just, ethical, and civilized.
Co-Authors Ahmad Ahmad Cucu Supyan Cahyana Franky Aryadi Gamal Abdul Nasir Muhamad Javier Ramzy Ronald Samuel Wuisan Upik Mutiara