Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS PRACTICES OF POLITICAL STABILITY IMPLEMENTATION IN SOUTHEAST ASIA Eliza Meiyani; Delila Putri Sadayi; Fadhil Hayan Mochammad
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i1.2545

Abstract

Stability is a condition of a system whose components tend to fall into, or return to, an established relationship. Stability is the same as the absence of fundamental or chaotic changes in a political system, or changes that occur within agreed or predetermined boundaries. Development requires security and stability. The development itself must also include security and stability, even the development of security and stability is carried out together with development in other fields. This study uses descriptive qualitative methods, with data collection techniques in the form of literature studies by looking at previous studies, as well as online news as a supporting source. From the data obtained, it will be processed by linking it with the theories that have been previously designed. The approach to political stability as a form of government resilience can be seen from the government management system related to the economy, social, and state security, thus creating political stability in it. Singapore's government tends to have good governance so that it affects the level of the economy and the stability of the country itself, in contrast to Thailand and Myanmar which have a fluctuating index. Especially Myanmar, which has the smallest index for 10 years below the index of 20. This is influenced by the leadershipofr of the warring parties so that it has an impact on coups that often occur.
Parenting After Separation: Designing Legal Standards That Reduce Conflict, Not Just Resolve It Fadhil Hayan Mochammad
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Post-separation parenting disputes often persisted despite final court orders because legal standards were commonly drafted to allocate parental time and authority rather than to govern the recurring coordination problems that generated repeat conflict. This article examined post-separation parenting as a governance challenge and assessed how legal standards could be designed to reduce conflict over time, not merely to resolve a single dispute. A doctrinal–normative analysis with a comparative policy lens was applied to identify where under-specified orders failed in practice, especially in schedules and handovers, shared decision-making, communication, and enforcement. The study developed a design framework that operationalized child-centred aims through mandatory minimum-content parenting plans, default rules for predictable flashpoints, defined decision domains with deadlock procedures, regulated communication protocols, and graduated enforcement that corrected minor breaches quickly while escalating responses for persistent non-compliance. The analysis also showed that cooperative models were unsafe or ineffective in high-conflict and high-risk families, requiring differentiated pathways such as parallel parenting and safety-sensitive restrictions. These findings supported a policy rubric for courts and legislators to draft standards that produced stability and reduced incentives for strategic obstruction.
The Transformation of the Principle of Good Faith in Digital Agreements: A Civil Law Analysis of Consumer Protection in Electronic Contracts Fadhil Hayan Mochammad
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.1012

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of the principle of good faith in digital agreements within a civil law framework, focusing specifically on consumer protection in electronic contracts. The research aims to analyze how technological developments, platform-based contracting, and data-driven business models have reshaped the doctrinal meaning and operational function of good faith in contemporary digital markets. Employing a qualitative research design based on systematic literature review and doctrinal analysis, the study synthesizes recent academic scholarship, regulatory developments, and legal interpretations concerning electronic contracts, transparency obligations, unfair terms, and digital content regulation. The findings reveal that good faith has evolved from a predominantly interpretative and corrective principle into a broader governance standard encompassing transparency-based fairness, protection of reasonable consumer expectations, control of unilateral modification clauses, and accountability in algorithmic decision-making. The study further identifies a growing convergence between contract law, consumer protection law, and data protection regulation, indicating that good faith increasingly functions as a connective normative principle across digital regulatory regimes. The research concludes that sustainable digital contract governance requires reconceptualizing good faith as a structural fairness standard capable of addressing informational and technological asymmetries in electronic commerce.
Negotiating Customary Values: A Legal Anthropological Study of Social Conflict Resolution in Local Communities Amid Modernization Eliza Meiyani; Fadhil Hayan Mochammad
Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): February - April
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grmilf.v6i2.1764

Abstract

This study examines how customary values and positive law are negotiated in the resolution of social conflicts within local communities amid ongoing processes of modernization. The objective of the research is to analyze the persistence, adaptation, and interaction of customary norms and formal legal systems from a legal anthropological perspective, while identifying the implications of such interactions for legitimacy, justice outcomes, and sustainable governance. The study employs a qualitative research approach grounded in a systematic literature review of classical and contemporary scholarship in legal anthropology, socio-legal studies, and conflict resolution. Through thematic content analysis, the research synthesizes recurring patterns, conceptual arguments, and empirical findings on legal pluralism, forum choice, and hybrid dispute-resolution mechanisms. The results indicate that modernization does not displace customary law but reshapes the conditions under which it operates, leading to negotiated and hybrid forms of legality. Customary mechanisms remain socially legitimate and effective, particularly for community-based disputes, while positive law is strategically mobilized for enforceability and external recognition. The key finding of this study is that social conflict resolution in plural legal contexts is best understood as a process of negotiated legality, in which customary values and state law are continuously reinterpreted and combined. These findings contribute to theoretical debates on legal pluralism and offer insights into the design of inclusive and sustainable conflict-resolution frameworks in modernizing societies.
Multikulturalisme dan Ketahanan Sosial: Strategi Integrasi Nasional dalam Konteks Perubahan Sosial di Ambon dan Sanggau Musdalipa Mudalipa; Eliza Meiyani; Munirah Munirah; Fadhil Hayan Mochammad
Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional Vol 31, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkn.110088

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis strategi integrasi nasional dalam memperkuat ketahanan sosial di wilayah multikultural pascakonflik, dengan studi kasus di Kota Ambon (Maluku) dan Kabupaten Sanggau (Kalimantan Barat). Kedua wilayah ini dipilih karena memiliki latar belakang konflik sosial yang berbeda namun sama-sama merepresentasikan tantangan integrasi dalam konteks keberagaman etnis, agama, dan nilai budaya lokal. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan data sekunder yang dianalisis menggunakan perangkat lunak NVivo 12 Plus melalui teknik analisis tematik. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa integrasi nasional di Ambon berhasil didorong oleh sinergi antara intervensi negara, seperti pendidikan damai dan forum kerukunan umat, dan revitalisasi nilai lokal Pela Gandong sebagai instrumen sosial rekonsiliasi. Sebaliknya, di Sanggau, strategi integrasi cenderung bersifat top-down dan belum mengakomodasi secara penuh nilai-nilai hukum adat Dayak, sehingga ketahanan sosial rentan terganggu oleh konflik agraria dan eksklusi budaya. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa keberhasilan integrasi nasional sangat bergantung pada pengakuan substantif terhadap nilai lokal serta kolaborasi antara negara dan masyarakat. Rekomendasi mencakup penguatan kebijakan berbasis budaya, desain pendidikan multikultural kontekstual, dan pelibatan aktif lembaga adat dalam proses pembangunan sosial.