Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS PRACTICES OF POLITICAL STABILITY IMPLEMENTATION IN SOUTHEAST ASIA Eliza Meiyani; Delila Putri Sadayi; Fadhil Hayan Mochammad
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i1.2545

Abstract

Stability is a condition of a system whose components tend to fall into, or return to, an established relationship. Stability is the same as the absence of fundamental or chaotic changes in a political system, or changes that occur within agreed or predetermined boundaries. Development requires security and stability. The development itself must also include security and stability, even the development of security and stability is carried out together with development in other fields. This study uses descriptive qualitative methods, with data collection techniques in the form of literature studies by looking at previous studies, as well as online news as a supporting source. From the data obtained, it will be processed by linking it with the theories that have been previously designed. The approach to political stability as a form of government resilience can be seen from the government management system related to the economy, social, and state security, thus creating political stability in it. Singapore's government tends to have good governance so that it affects the level of the economy and the stability of the country itself, in contrast to Thailand and Myanmar which have a fluctuating index. Especially Myanmar, which has the smallest index for 10 years below the index of 20. This is influenced by the leadershipofr of the warring parties so that it has an impact on coups that often occur.
Parenting After Separation: Designing Legal Standards That Reduce Conflict, Not Just Resolve It Fadhil Hayan Mochammad
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Post-separation parenting disputes often persisted despite final court orders because legal standards were commonly drafted to allocate parental time and authority rather than to govern the recurring coordination problems that generated repeat conflict. This article examined post-separation parenting as a governance challenge and assessed how legal standards could be designed to reduce conflict over time, not merely to resolve a single dispute. A doctrinal–normative analysis with a comparative policy lens was applied to identify where under-specified orders failed in practice, especially in schedules and handovers, shared decision-making, communication, and enforcement. The study developed a design framework that operationalized child-centred aims through mandatory minimum-content parenting plans, default rules for predictable flashpoints, defined decision domains with deadlock procedures, regulated communication protocols, and graduated enforcement that corrected minor breaches quickly while escalating responses for persistent non-compliance. The analysis also showed that cooperative models were unsafe or ineffective in high-conflict and high-risk families, requiring differentiated pathways such as parallel parenting and safety-sensitive restrictions. These findings supported a policy rubric for courts and legislators to draft standards that produced stability and reduced incentives for strategic obstruction.