Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology (ICESST) Proceeding of The International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities Innovation
Steffie Mega Mahardhika
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Framing Justice and Public Perception : A Discourse Analysis of the Agus Salim Donation Controversy in Online Media Inti Englishtina; Steffie Mega Mahardhika; Kristin Marwinda
The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology (ICESST) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/icesst.v3i2.500

Abstract

This study explores the discourse surrounding the Agus Salim donation controversy, focusing on how media narratives and legal rhetoric shape public perception. Drawing on two primary sources—articles from Brilio.net and KapanLagi.com—the research employs critical discourse analysis to examine the framing of key events, including allegations of donation mismanagement, legal strategies, and the public's reaction to the case. The findings reveal how media outlets construct competing narratives, emphasizing the roles of public figures, lawyers, and victims in influencing the discourse. By analyzing language use, power dynamics, and ideological positioning, this study highlights the interplay between legal rhetoric and public opinion in cases of social and moral significance. The research contributes to understanding how controversies are framed in digital media and their implications for justice and accountability in contemporary society.
Framing Justice and Public Perception: A Discourse Analysis of the Agus Salim Donation Controversy in Online Media Inti Englishtina; Steffie Mega Mahardhika; Kristin Marwinda
Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities Innovation Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): June : Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Sciences and Humani
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/icsshi.v1i1.12

Abstract

This study explores the discourse surrounding the Agus Salim donation controversy, focusing on how media narratives and legal rhetoric shape public perception. Drawing on two primary sources—articles from Brilio.net and KapanLagi.com—the research employs critical discourse analysis to examine the framing of key events, including allegations of donation mismanagement, legal strategies, and the public's reaction to the case. The findings reveal how media outlets construct competing narratives, emphasizing the roles of public figures, lawyers, and victims in influencing the discourse. By analyzing language use, power dynamics, and ideological positioning, this study highlights the interplay between legal rhetoric and public opinion in cases of social and moral significance. The research contributes to understanding how controversies are framed in digital media and their implications for justice and accountability in contemporary society.
Co-Authors Inti Englishtina Kristin Marwinda