Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology (ICESST) JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Proceeding of The International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities Innovation
Steffie Mega Mahardhika
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Framing Justice and Public Perception : A Discourse Analysis of the Agus Salim Donation Controversy in Online Media Inti Englishtina; Steffie Mega Mahardhika; Kristin Marwinda
The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology (ICESST) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): The International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Technology
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/icesst.v3i2.500

Abstract

This study explores the discourse surrounding the Agus Salim donation controversy, focusing on how media narratives and legal rhetoric shape public perception. Drawing on two primary sources—articles from Brilio.net and KapanLagi.com—the research employs critical discourse analysis to examine the framing of key events, including allegations of donation mismanagement, legal strategies, and the public's reaction to the case. The findings reveal how media outlets construct competing narratives, emphasizing the roles of public figures, lawyers, and victims in influencing the discourse. By analyzing language use, power dynamics, and ideological positioning, this study highlights the interplay between legal rhetoric and public opinion in cases of social and moral significance. The research contributes to understanding how controversies are framed in digital media and their implications for justice and accountability in contemporary society.
Framing Justice and Public Perception: A Discourse Analysis of the Agus Salim Donation Controversy in Online Media Inti Englishtina; Steffie Mega Mahardhika; Kristin Marwinda
Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities Innovation Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): June : Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Sciences and Humani
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/icsshi.v1i1.12

Abstract

This study explores the discourse surrounding the Agus Salim donation controversy, focusing on how media narratives and legal rhetoric shape public perception. Drawing on two primary sources—articles from Brilio.net and KapanLagi.com—the research employs critical discourse analysis to examine the framing of key events, including allegations of donation mismanagement, legal strategies, and the public's reaction to the case. The findings reveal how media outlets construct competing narratives, emphasizing the roles of public figures, lawyers, and victims in influencing the discourse. By analyzing language use, power dynamics, and ideological positioning, this study highlights the interplay between legal rhetoric and public opinion in cases of social and moral significance. The research contributes to understanding how controversies are framed in digital media and their implications for justice and accountability in contemporary society.
CONSTRUCTING ACCESSIBLE AND ENGAGING VIDEO NARRATIVES: METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN PSYCH2GO YOUTUBE CHANNEL Maria Febrianti; Steffie Mega Mahardhika
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK (JMIA)  April 2026
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v3i2.9792

Abstract

The increasing consumption of mental health content on digital platforms has intensified the need for effective communication strategies that balance clarity and audience engagement. This study examines how metadiscourse markers function in Psych2Go YouTube video narratives to construct accessible and engaging edutainment discourse. Drawing on Hyland’s (2005) metadiscourse framework and employing Qualitative Content Analysis (Mayring, 2000), this study analyses three selected video transcripts. The findings reveal that interactive markers function as structural devices that organize and simplify complex psychological information, while interactional markers serve as relational tools that foster audience involvement and parasocial connection. More importantly, the study demonstrates that the effectiveness of Psych2Go’s narratives lies in the dynamic interplay between these two marker types, enabling the transformation of monologic discourse into a dialogic and relatable experience. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how linguistic strategies shape digital communication.
Co-Authors Inti Englishtina Kristin Marwinda Maria Febrianti