Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Lenny Maria Aritonang
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Perbedaan Unsur Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan dalam Undang-Undang Tipikor dan Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan: Implikasi terhadap Penegakan Hukum Very Pahala Sijabat; Zico Ricardo Aritonang; Lenny Maria Aritonang; Agatha Christie Tarigan
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 7 (2024): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i7.797

Abstract

Abuse of authority is an important issue in criminal and administrative law in Indonesia. This study discusses the differences in elements of abuse of authority in the Corruption Law and the State Administration Law and their impact on law enforcement. The results of the analysis show that the differences in approach in the two laws have the potential to cause legal uncertainty and overlapping authority. Regulation harmonization is needed to ensure the effectiveness of law enforcement and prevent unnecessary criminalization of public officials.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana atas Deepfake AI dalam Produksi dan Distribusi Pornografi Digital di Indonesia Kevin David Sirait; Arman Saut Rivando; Cecilia Angel; Zico Ricardo Aritonang; Lenny Maria Aritonang
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 7 (2026): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i7.3458

Abstract

The development of deepfake technology based on Artificial Intelligence has given rise to complex manipulative digital pornography crimes. This study analyzes the legal framework and criminal liability in Indonesia. The results show that regulations such as the Pornography Law and the ITE Law have not specifically regulated deepfake, creating a legal vacuum. Nevertheless, perpetrators can be prosecuted interpretatively through existing provisions. Regarding criminal liability, perpetrators who produce and distribute deepfake pornographic content can be held accountable if the elements of actus reus and mens rea are fulfilled. However, there are obstacles in evidence and perpetrator identification due to anonymity and the borderless nature of digital technology.
Co-Authors Agatha Christie Tarigan Arman Saut Rivando Cecilia Angel Kevin David Sirait Very Pahala Sijabat Zico Ricardo Aritonang