Muhtadi Anshor, Ahmad
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

All You Can Eat dalam Tinjauan Maslahah al-Mursalah : Implikasi Hukum Islam terhadap Praktik Bisnis Modern ubaidillah, ubaidillah; Nurohman, Dede; Muhtadi Anshor, Ahmad
Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Tasyri'
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tsyr.v4i1.215

Abstract

The "All You Can Eat" (AYCE) business practice has become a popular business model among the public, especially in the culinary sector. However, this phenomenon raises a number of questions related to halalness and sustainability from an Islamic legal perspective. This research aims to analyze AYCE buying and selling practices through a review Maslahah al-Mursalah (benefits that are not directly explained in the text) as an approach in Islamic law. The method used is qualitative analysis with a normative approach that examines fiqh principles and maslahah theory to assess whether AYCE practices bring benefits to individuals and society. This research found that although AYCE can provide economic benefits for entrepreneurs and satisfaction for consumers, there are potential losses in the aspects of waste (israf), nutritional imbalances, and impacts on health that must be avoided. In perspective Maslahah al-Mursalah AYCE practices can be justified if the principles of welfare and sustainability are maintained, but there needs to be strict regulation to ensure that no party is harmed and that excessive consumption can be avoided. This research concludes that the application of principles Maslahah al-Mursalah In business, AYCE can potentially provide benefits as long as it is in accordance with the values ​​of justice and balance in Islam.
Larangan Pernikahan Semarga Dalam Adat Batak di Kabupaten Labuhan Batu Utara Persepektif Teori Konflik George Simmel Pangestu, Pujo; Asmawi; Muhtadi Anshor, Ahmad
Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Penerbitan dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) IAIFA Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58401/takwiluna.v6i1.2048

Abstract

The Batak community has experienced a shift in the meaning of marriage from the prohibition of surname marriage to an eleutherogamous marriage system that does not recognize the prohibition of surname marriage. This research uses a qualitative approach to understand the relationship between George Simmel's conflict theory and marriage issues in Indonesia, especially in the event of surname marriage in Labuhan Batu Utara. The main focus of this research is how surname marriage causes conflict which is seen as a form of social tension and reshapes the social structure of society. The result of this research is that according to Simmel, conflicts that violate the tradition of prohibiting semarga marriages in the Batak tradition in Labuhan Batu Utara appear destructive, can actually strengthen social cohesion by affirming community norms and values, while creating space for individuals to show their identity and superiority in the larger social order. Conflicts arising from the clash between old traditions and new customs in Batak society in Labuhan Batu Utara show new customs where personal and family happiness are increasingly prioritized over the customary prohibition of semarga marriage. In this context, the flexibility of the Batak community in dealing with evolving social dynamics, adopting new customs that are more in line with the needs and aspirations of individuals and families today.