Nusrotus Sa’idah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Survey Attitude Toward The Level Of Understanding Of Descriptive Statistics by Students in Higher Education: Pair Comparison Methode Nusrotus Sa’idah; Jailani; Sudiyatno
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 8 No 1 (2024): February
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v8i1.63450

Abstract

Many people find statistics very difficult. This impacts students not only on their academic performance but also on unpleasant influences or negative perceptions. This research aims to produce a scaling instrument for attitudes toward student statistics levels using the pair comparison method with valid and reliable characteristics. This research is a quantitative descriptive research by developing a research instrument with a pair comparison scale. The subjects of this research were 160 students who had received courses. This instrument consists of 11 dimensions that measure students' attitudes toward their level of understanding of statistics. The analysis uses quantitative description. The results of scaling the student attitude instrument towards the level of understanding of statistics using the pair comparison method show that the characteristics of each dimension are valid and the Cronbach value meets high-reliability criteria. The results of scaling the attitude instrument towards statistical material with the highest average response order were in the material understanding mode," with a value of 0.695. This high-reliability value can indicate a wider range of abilities, meaning more heterogeneous. With this pair comparison method scaling, it can capture substantial heterogeneity in a person's personal value hierarchy, and it is easier for respondents to answer because they compare two objects.
Pengukuran Kualitas Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Untuk Meningkatkan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pengantar Industri Migas Eka Megawati; Meita Rezki Vegatama; Nusrotus Sa’idah
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 02, Juni 2026 Public
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.44820

Abstract

Evaluating the quality of test instruments is an important step in ensuring the acceptability and accuracy of measuring student learning outcomes. This study aims to analyze the quality of 50 multiple-choice questions in the Introduction to the Oil and Gas Industry course in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discriminatory power. The method used is quantitative item analysis with a descriptive and inferential statistical approach based on the results of validity tests, reliability using Cronbach's Alpha, difficulty level, and discriminatory power. The analysis results show that most of the items are valid. The reliability test obtained a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.88 which is included in the high category, indicating good internal consistency of the instrument. The level of difficulty of the questions is predominantly in the medium category, while the discriminatory power is mostly in the good category. However, several items were still found to be invalid and have low discriminatory power so that they need to be revised or removed. Overall, the test instrument in the Introduction to the Oil and Gas Industry course can be categorized as good quality and suitable for use with improvements to certain items.