Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pembagian Hak Waris Berdasarkan Hadis Bukhari Muslim Dan Pasal-Pasal Kuhperdata Intan Sukmawati; Tajul Arifin
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i3.388

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the division of inheritance rights based on the Hadiths of Bukhari and Muslim and the Articles of the Civil Code; how the division of inheritance rights is viewed in the perspective of the Hadiths of Bukhari and whether it is in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code. The research method used is document analysis, collecting data from Islamic law and civil law literature and comparing the two. The results show that the division of inheritance rights in the Hadiths of Bukhari emphasizes the principles of equality and justice for heirs, while the Civil Code regulates the division of inheritance rights based on lineage and the number of heirs. So, the division of inheritance rights in the Hadiths of Bukhari emphasizes the principles of equality and justice, while the Civil Code regulates the division of inheritance rights based on lineage and the number of heirs, thus indicating a difference in approach in determining inheritance in the context of Islamic law and civil law in Indonesia.
The Impact of Palm Oil Plantation Exploitation on the Environment in Sumatra : Analysis of Legal Violations Euis Maesaroh; Intan Sukmawati; Kanisa Sabila; Sitta Khairunnisa
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v3i1.848

Abstract

Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia guarantees the right of every person to live in a good and healthy environment, while Article 33 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia affirms the principle of sustainable and environmentally friendly development as the basis for natural resource management. These constitutional norms are implemented through Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management, which requires every business activity to prevent any pollution and/or environmental damage. In addition, through Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation as amended by Law Number 6 of 2023, there have been significant changes in the business licensing system and environmental protection instruments, including the integration of environmental approval into risk-based business licensing as regulated in Articles 22 and 23. In the context of oil palm plantations in Sumatra, these changes in norms have legal implications for the fulfillment of business actors' legal obligations in environmental protection and management. This study aims to analyze the impact of oil palm plantation exploitation in Sumatra from an environmental law perspective, particularly in relation to legal violations based on the normative framework of applicable laws and regulations after the enactment of the Job Creation Law.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara oleh PTUN: Menelaah Alasan Hukum yang Digunakan Hakim Dalam Membatalkan KTUN Tansya Hadiansyah Ramdi; Intan Sukmawati; Euis Maesaroh; Aji Nugraha; Taufiq Alamsyah
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1678

Abstract

This study aims to gain an in-depth understanding of the legal reasoning used by judges in the Administrative Court (PTUN) in annulling State Administrative Decisions (KTUN), as well as to examine the legal implications for the parties involved and the overall system of government administration. This research employs a normative juridical method with three approaches: statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The analysis was conducted qualitatively by studying reference books and reviewing court decisions. The study shows that the annulment of KTUN by PTUN judges is based on three important factors, namely lack of authority (ultra vires), procedural defects, and substantive defects in the decision. In addition, violations of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB), such as the principles of legal certainty, prudence, and proportionality, also constitute important considerations for judges. In the judicial process, judges not only consider the formal aspects of the law, but also take into account substantive justice in order to protect citizens’ rights from improper governmental actions. The implications of the annulment of KTUN include the restoration of the plaintiff’s rights through the process of restitutio in integrum, the obligation of administrative officials to revoke or correct the issued decision, as well as the potential impact on third parties involved in the decision. In general, the annulment of KTUN serves as a legal control mechanism over government administration while also encouraging the realization of good and transparent governance within a state governed by the rule of law.